ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2022
Comparing In-View to Out-of-View Stimulus Arrangements When Teaching Receptive Labels for Children Diagnosed With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One common best practice recommendation for teaching receptive labels to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder is for the stimulus array to be arranged outside of the view of the learner. Another strategy that may have benefits would be to arrange the stimuli in view of the learner. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness and efficiency of arranging the stimulus array in view versus out of view of the learner when teaching receptive labels to three children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. The results of an adapted alternating-treatments design demonstrated that both conditions were effective, and all participants reached the mastery criterion on all training sets. However, the in-view condition was more, or equally, efficient with respect to sessions to mastery when compared to the out-of-view condition. The results are discussed with respect to clinical and research implications for best practice recommendations related to teaching receptive language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.