Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35692432›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Evaluating the Cognitive Impacts of Drospirenone, a Spironolactone-Derived Progestin, Independently and in Combination With Ethinyl Estradiol in Ovariectomized Adult Rats.

Stephanie V Koebele, Mallori L Poisson, Justin M Palmer, Claire Berns-Leone, Steven N Northup-Smith, Veronica L Peña, Isabel M Strouse, Haidyn L Bulen, Shruti Patel, Corissa Croft and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie V KoebeleDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Mallori L PoissonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Justin M PalmerDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Claire Berns-LeoneDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Steven N Northup-SmithDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Veronica L PeñaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Isabel M StrouseDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Haidyn L BulenDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Shruti PatelDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Corissa CroftDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Heather A Bimonte-NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Arizona State University · USArizona Alzheimer’s Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral contraceptives and hormone therapies require a progestogen component to prevent ovulation, curtail uterine hyperplasia, and reduce gynecological cancer risk. Diverse classes of synthetic progestogens, called progestins, are used as natural progesterone alternatives due to progesterone's low oral bioavailability. Progesterone and several synthetic analogs can negatively impact cognition and reverse some neuroprotective estrogen effects. Here, we investigate drospirenone, a spironolactone-derived progestin, which has unique pharmacological properties compared to other clinically-available progestins and natural progesterone, for its impact on spatial memory, anxiety-like behavior, and brain regions crucial to these cognitive tasks. Experiment 1 assessed three drospirenone doses in young adult, ovariectomized rats, and found that a moderate drospirenone dose benefited spatial memory. Experiment 2 investigated this moderate drospirenone dose with and without concomitant ethinyl estradiol (EE) treatment, the most common synthetic estrogen in oral contraceptives. Results demonstrate that the addition of EE to drospirenone administration reversed the beneficial working memory effects of drospirenone. The hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and perirhinal cortex were then probed for proteins known to elicit estrogen- and progestin- mediated effects on learning and memory, including glutamate decarboxylase (GAD)65, GAD67, and insulin-like growth factor receptor protein expression, using western blot. EE increased GAD expression in the perirhinal cortex. Taken together, results underscore the necessity to consider the distinct cognitive and neural impacts of clinically-available synthetic estrogen and progesterone analogs, and why they produce unique cognitive profiles when administered together compared to those observed when each hormone is administered separately.

Indexed as

cognitioncontraceptivedrospirenone (DRSP)ethinyl estradiol (EE)rat model

Identifiers

PMID35692432
PMCPMC9177129
OpenAlexW4281479553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.