ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
The Reliability and Validity of the Malay Version of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the SF-36v2 in patients with severe mental illnesses in China: factor structure, reliability, and validity.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Validity and Quality of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) Screening Tools Available for Women Globally: A Systematic Review.Clinics and practice · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire is a reliable instrument for measuring health-related quality of life. This study aimed to develop a Malay version of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire and to evaluate the health-related impact of Malaysian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. The participants were women who were diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome using Rotterdam criteria in a gynecology clinic. Reliability was determined by internal consistency using Cronbach's coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability using an intra-class correlation coefficient. Validity was assessed through convergent and discriminant validity. Examining the correlation between similar content of the Malay version of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire and the SF-36 assessed the convergent validity. The discriminant validity was assessed using the known group comparison. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was over 0.70 for the total scale and over 0.60 for each subscale. Known group comparison supported the discriminant validity. The Malay version of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire differentiated between the subgroups of women who differed in polycystic ovary syndrome-specific symptoms. Convergent validity was consistent with the good positive correlation between related subscales of the two instruments. Polycystic ovary syndrome women in Malaysia scored the lowest for the weight (3.74) and infertility (3.41) domains, thereby indicating worse health status in these domains. Body hair (5.42) was the least troublesome for the local population. The Malay version of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the health-related quality of life among women in the local population. It can be used to objectively assess the quality of life among Malaysian women with polycystic ovary syndrome and evaluate their responsiveness to treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.