ArticleGMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW2022
Validation of the Visia
Article in GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Topical Skincare Enhances Picosecond Laser Treatment Outcomes for Photoaging: A Prospective Split-Face Trial.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of low-fluence 1064 nm picosecond laser with/without micro-lens arrays for melasma treatment: a randomized, split-face controlled study.Lasers in medical science · 2025Trial
- Phenylalanine Butyramide: A Butyrate Derivative as a Novel Inhibitor of Tyrosinase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Trial
- Evaluating the Impact of Oleocanthal and Oleacein on Skin Aging: Results of a Randomized Clinical Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Trial
- Severe Iatrogenic Facial Lipoatrophy Following Intralesional Corticosteroid Injections: Management with a Personalised Multimodal Protocol-A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of VISIA-Derived Erythema Metrics Against Blinded Clinician Assessment After Intense Pulsed Light Therapy in Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea: A Real-World Cohort Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Use of VISIA-CR Generation 5 in Aesthetic Skin Assessment: A Single-Case Review.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser with diffractive lens array vs. fractional microneedle radiofrequency for the treatment of facial photoaging: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk factors associated with higher skin age relative to chronological age in community-dwelling middle-aged Japanese adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser for Asian skin rejuvenation: clinical efficacy and the role of photoprotective behaviours.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- A comparative study of an advanced skin imaging system in diagnosing facial pigmentary and inflammatory conditions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Assessment of the reproducibility and accuracy of the VisiaGMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2023Article
- Investigating the effects of Argireline in a skin serum containing hyaluronic acids on skin surface wrinkles using the VisiaGMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Validation of the Visia Method: A large data cloud was analysed statistically following a clinical study. In the study, facial images of nineteen women were obtained at two different time points, before and three months after following a skin care routine. Objective analysis was provided by the Visia Results: There was a high level of correlation among the three offered measurement methods. From 144 calculations of the correlations 128 (88.9%) were statistically significant (p<0.05). The correlation coefficients in the vast majority of cases pointed to very clear correlations between the two examined variables. In particular, 50% of the absolute values of these correlations were above 0.945. The few insignificant results were in UV spots and wrinkles. All three methods used to measure the data on skin aspects, i.e., the percentiles, the feature count and the absolute score, served equally well when making comparisons between the two time points. When examining the correlation coefficients for the three capture perspectives, i.e., left, front and right views, their percentages of significant results were found to be only marginally different. Of the 144 examined correlations, 121 were found to be statistically significant (84%). The average correlation coefficient was r=0.74, which pointed to a very clear correlation between the data. The few insignificant results were in wrinkles, UV spots and spots. The Visia Conclusion: The Visia
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.