ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2022
The effect of framework fabrication technique on the fit accuracy of full arch screw retained implant supported prostheses.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of framework material on the global and region-specific fabrication accuracy and fit of 3-unit screw-retained implant frameworks.Odontology · 2026Article
- Passive fit and trueness of complete-arch implant-supported cobalt chromium frameworks manufactured using different digital techniques: a laboratory study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Cumulative Error in Digital Workflows for Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fit analysis of implant-supported Co-Cr bars fabricated using casting, selective laser sintering, soft and dense milling techniques.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of CAD-CAM Milled Versus DMLS Titanium Frameworks for Hybrid Denture Prosthesis: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Passive fit and time efficiency for prefabricated versus conventionally constructed cobalt chromium CAD\CAM 3-unit implant supported frameworks in free end saddle models: a pilot invitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Interface misfit of conventionally milled and novel hybrid full-arch implant-supported titanium frameworks.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Outcomes and Complications of 33 Soft-Milled Cobalt-Chromium-Ceramic Full-Arch Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with up to 10-Year Follow-Up.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of fit of Co-Cr full arch screw-retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis fabricated among three different methods: conventional casting, milling, and additive manufacturing technology. Materials and methods: A master model of a completely edentulous mandible with five internal connection implants was utilized. Thirty full arch Co-Cr screw-retained implant-supported frameworks were fabricated by three different methods: conventional casting, milling, and additive manufacturing (AM) technology. The marginal fit was measured using a coordinate measuring machine in x-, y-, and z-axes, as well as the three-dimensional discrepancy. The casting group were measured twice: before the adaptation procedure and again after the adaptation procedure (sectioning and laser welding). For comparisons of marginal fit of frameworks between different groups one-way analysis of variance and Games Howell test was used. Paired Results: There were statistically significant differences in marginal fit and width distortion between groups ( Conclusion: Full arch screw-retained implant-supported frameworks fabricated with any of the three fabrication techniques using cobalt-chromium material exhibited acceptable marginal fit. Milling fabrication technique showed the most accurate marginal fit. Adaptation procedure for the cast group has significantly improved the marginal fit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.