Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35692106›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

Retrospective Study from a Single Center to Identify Risk Factors Associated with Reinfection in Patients Undergoing 2-Stage Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Bingshi Zhang, Zeming Liu, Sikai Liu, Bo Liu, Mengnan Li, Wenao Li, Yongtai Han

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bingshi ZhangDepartment of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Zeming LiuDepartment of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Sikai LiuDepartment of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Bo LiuDepartment of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Mengnan LiDepartment of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Wenao LiDepartment of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Yongtai HanDepartment of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Hebei Medical University · CNThird Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study identified risk factors associated with reinfection and created a scoring system designed for patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) who have undergone prosthetic resection and spacer implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who underwent 2-stage revision for PJI from January 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: infection recurrence and infection cure. Demographic and clinical information, laboratory test results, and radiological images that were potentially associated with infection were obtained and analyzed. RESULTS Seven independent risk (protective) factors for infection recurrence in patients with PJI who underwent 2-stage hip revision surgery were identified: C-reactive protein level, type of bacterial infection, age, immunosuppression, albumin/globulin ratio, glucose level, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Finally, a weighted scoring system of 100-mark system was established and the area under the curve was 0.965 (95% confidential interval=0.947-0.983). The predictive scores for low risk (≤30%), moderate risk (31-69%), and high risk (≥70%) of infection recurrence were ≤45, 46-77, and ≥78, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For patients with PJI who had already undergone joint resection and spacer implantation, this newly established scoring system might help determine the accurate risk of infection recurrence after a definitive new prosthesis implantation. Patients with scores greater than 78 points would be considered very likely to have an infection recurrence. Therefore, the second-stage revision surgery should be changed to an additional anti-infection treatment or a debridement surgery instead of a definitive prosthesis implantation surgery.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, HipProsthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansReinfectionReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35692106
PMCPMC9205198
OpenAlexW4281737855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.