Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35692054›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Development and validation of a novel mitophagy-related gene prognostic signature for glioblastoma multiforme.

Jinghua Wang, Xinqi Qiu, Jiayu Huang, Zewei Zhuo, Hao Chen, Ruijie Zeng, Huihuan Wu, Kehang Guo, Qi Yang, Huiling Ye and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A Multi-Omics Analysis of a Mitophagy-Related Signature in Pan-Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinghua Wang *Department of Hematology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xinqi Qiu *Zhuguang Community Healthcare Center, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jiayu Huang *Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Huizhou Municipal Central People's Hospital, Huizhou, 516001, People's Republic of China.
Zewei Zhuo *School of Bioscience and Bioengineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Hao ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Ruijie ZengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Huihuan WuSchool of Bioscience and Bioengineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Kehang GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Qi YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Huiling YeDepartment of General Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China. yehuiling@gyfyy.com.
Wei HuangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA. huangwe@ucmail.uc.edu.
Yujun LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China. luoyj66@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNHuizhou Central People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most malignant tumors in brain with high morbidity and mortality. Mitophagy plays a significant role in carcinogenesis, metastasis, and invasion. In our study, we aim to construct a mitophagy-related risk model to predict prognosis in GBM.

methodsRNA-seq data combined with clinical information were downloaded from TCGA. The 4-gene risk model and nomograph was then constructed and validated in external cohort. Evaluation of immune infiltration, functional enrichment and tumor microenvironment (TME) were then performed.

resultA mitophagy-related risk model was established and patients in TCGA and CGGA were classified into low-risk and high-risk groups. In both cohorts, patients in low-risk group had improved survival, while high-risk group had poor prognosis. Also, the risk model was identified as an independent factor for predicting overall survival via Cox regression. Furthermore, a prognostic nomogram including mitophagy signatures was established with excellent predictive performance. In addition, the risk model was closely associated with regulation of immune infiltration as well as TME.

conclusionIn conclusion, our study constructed a mitophagy-related risk model, which can be utilized for the clinical prognostic prediction in GBM.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMitophagyPrognosisTranscriptomeTumor MicroenvironmentGlioblastoma multiformeMitophagyPrognosisRisk modelRisk signature

Identifiers

PMID35692054
PMCPMC9190154
OpenAlexW4282568800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.