Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35692040›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

Advances in understanding Norway spruce natural resistance to needle bladder rust infection: transcriptional and secondary metabolites profiling.

Carlos Trujillo-Moya, Andrea Ganthaler, Wolfgang Stöggl, Erwann Arc, Ilse Kranner, Silvio Schueler, Reinhard Ertl, Ana Espinosa-Ruiz, Maria Ángeles Martínez-Godoy, Jan-Peter George and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bark beetle (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Trujillo-Moya *Department of Forest Growth, Silviculture & Genetics, Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFW, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131, Vienna, Austria. carlos.trujillo-moya@bfw.gv.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9300-0226
Andrea Ganthaler *Department of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-6199
Wolfgang StögglDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-6464
Erwann ArcDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2344-1426
Ilse KrannerDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4959-9109
Silvio SchuelerDepartment of Forest Growth, Silviculture & Genetics, Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFW, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0155-5692
Reinhard ErtlUniversity of Veterinary Medicine, VetCore Facility for Research, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7485-3661
Ana Espinosa-RuizInstitute for Plant Molecular and Cell Biology (IBMCP), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) - Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV), Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-4518
Maria Ángeles Martínez-GodoyInstitute for Plant Molecular and Cell Biology (IBMCP), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) - Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV), Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1915-0968
Jan-Peter GeorgeDepartment of Forest Growth, Silviculture & Genetics, Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFW, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4285-746X
Stefan MayrDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3319-4396
Universität Innsbruck · ATAustrian Research Centre for Forests · ATConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P29896 and I4918Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4918Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeedle rust caused by the fungus Chrysomyxa rhododendri causes significant growth decline and increased mortality of young Norway spruce trees in subalpine forests. Extremely rare trees with enhanced resistance represent promising candidates for practice-oriented reproduction approaches. They also enable the investigation of tree molecular defence and resistance mechanisms against this fungal disease. Here, we combined RNA-Seq, RT-qPCR and secondary metabolite analyses during a period of 38 days following natural infection to investigate differences in constitutive and infection-induced defence between the resistant genotype PRA-R and three susceptible genotypes.

resultsGene expression and secondary metabolites significantly differed among genotypes from day 7 on and revealed already known, but also novel candidate genes involved in spruce molecular defence against this pathogen. Several key genes related to (here and previously identified) spruce defence pathways to needle rust were differentially expressed in PRA-R compared to susceptible genotypes, both constitutively (in non-symptomatic needles) and infection-induced (in symptomatic needles). These genes encoded both new and well-known antifungal proteins such as endochitinases and chitinases. Specific genetic characteristics concurred with varying phenolic, terpene, and hormone needle contents in the resistant genotype, among them higher accumulation of several flavonoids (mainly kaempferol and taxifolin), stilbenes, geranyl acetone, α-ionone, abscisic acid and salicylic acid.

conclusionsCombined transcriptional and metabolic profiling of the Norway spruce defence response to infection by C. rhododendri in adult trees under subalpine conditions confirmed the results previously gained on artificially infected young clones in the greenhouse, both regarding timing and development of infection, and providing new insights into genes and metabolic pathways involved. The comparison of genotypes with different degrees of susceptibility proved that several of the identified key genes are differently regulated in PRA-R, and that the resistant genotype combines a strong constitutive defence with an induced response in infected symptomatic needles following fungal invasion. Genetic and metabolic differences between the resistant and susceptible genotypes indicated a more effective hypersensitive response (HR) in needles of PRA-R that prevents penetration and spread of the rust fungus and leads to a lower proportion of symptomatic needles as well as reduced symptom development on the few affected needles.

Indexed as

PiceaGene Expression ProfilingImmunity, InnatePlant DiseasesTreesUrinary BladderBackgroundConiferForest treeFungal infectionHost–pathogen-interactionPhenolic compoundsPR ProteinsRNA sequencingTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35692040
PMCPMC9190139
OpenAlexW4282585188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.