Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35691982›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2022

Future perspectives for advancing regulatory science of nanotechnology-enabled health products.

Blanka Halamoda-Kenzaoui, Robert Geertsma, Joost Pouw, Adriele Prina-Mello, Moreno Carrer, Matthias Roesslein, Adrienne Sips, Klaus Michael Weltring, Kathleen Spring, Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Regulatory aspects of a nanomaterial for imaging therapeutic cells.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. REFINE special issue.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Blanka Halamoda-KenzaouiEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Robert GeertsmaCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health & the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Joost PouwCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health & the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Adriele Prina-MelloLaboratory for Biological Characterization of Advanced Materials (LBCAM), Trinity Translational Medicine Institute (TTMI), Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Moreno CarrerLaboratory for Biological Characterization of Advanced Materials (LBCAM), Trinity Translational Medicine Institute (TTMI), Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Matthias RoessleinSwiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology, EMPA, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6858-4124
Adrienne SipsCentre for Safety of Substances and Products, National Institute for Public Health & the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Klaus Michael WeltringGesellschaft Für Bioanalytik Muenster E.V, Muenster, Germany.
Kathleen SpringGesellschaft Für Bioanalytik Muenster E.V, Muenster, Germany.
Susanne Bremer-HoffmannEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. susanne.bremer-hoffmann@ec.europa.eu.ORCID 0000-0001-9014-6131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of regulatory challenges for nanotechnology-enabled health products, followed by discussions with the involved stakeholders, is the first step towards a strategic planning of how such challenges can be successfully addressed in the future. In order to better understand whether the identified regulatory needs are sector-specific for health products or might also hinder the progress in other domains, the REFINE consortium reached out to communities representing other sectors that also exploit the potential of nanotechnology, i.e. industrial chemicals, food and cosmetics. Through a series of trans-sectorial workshops, REFINE partners identified common as well as sector-specific challenges and discussed possible ways forward. Potential solutions lie in a more strengthen collaboration between regulatory and research communities resulting in a targeted production and exploitation of academic data for the regulatory decision-making. Furthermore, a coordinated use of knowledge sharing platforms and databases, trans-sectorial standardisation activities and harmonisation of regulatory activities between geographical regions are possible ways forward, in line with the upcoming European political initiatives such as the Chemical Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). Finally, we also discuss the perspectives for further development and sustainability of methods and tools developed in the REFINE project.

Indexed as

NanotechnologyHarmonisationMethod standardisationNanomedical devicesNanomedicineRegulation

Identifiers

PMID35691982
PMCPMC9360093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.