Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35691974›Full record

Trial reportApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2022

Alpha/Theta Ratio Neurofeedback Training for Attention Enhancement in Normal Developing Children: A Brief Report.

Wenya Nan, Mengqi Wan, Yali Jiang, Xiaoping Shi, Feng Wan, Dan Cai

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenya NanDepartment of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Mengqi WanDepartment of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yali JiangDepartment of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoping ShiDepartment of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Feng WanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Dan CaiDepartment of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China. caidan@shnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3005-7724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention plays an important role in children's development and learning, and neurofeedback training (NFT) has been proposed as a promising method to improve attention, mainly in population with attention problems such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. However, whether this approach has a positive effect on attention in normal developing children has been rarely investigated. This pilot study conducted ten sessions of alpha/theta ratio (ATR) NFT on eight primary students in school environment, with two to three sessions per week. The results showed inter-individual difference in NFT learning efficacy that was assessed by the slope of ATR over training sessions. In addition, the attention performance was significantly improved after NFT. Importantly, the improvement of attention performance was positively correlated with the NFT learning efficacy. It thus highlighted the need for optimizing ATR NFT protocol for the benefits on attention at the individual level. Future work can employ a double-blind placebo-controlled design with larger sample size to validate the benefits of ATR NFT for attention in normal developing children.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityNeurofeedbackChildDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyHumansPilot ProjectsAlpha/theta ratioAttentionNeurofeedbackSchool children

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.