Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35691957›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Prognostic Impact of Radiological Splenic Artery Involvement in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Body and Tail.

Kei Kitamura, Minoru Esaki, Miyuki Sone, Shunsuke Sugawara, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka, Satoshi Nara, Daisuke Ban, Takeshi Takamoto, Takahiro Mizui, Kazuaki Shimada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kei KitamuraDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru EsakiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. mesaki@ncc.go.jp.
Miyuki SoneDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke SugawaraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyoshi HiraokaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi NaraDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke BanDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi TakamotoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro MizuiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuaki ShimadaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 31-A-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSplenic artery (SpA) involvement heralds poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and tail but is not included in the resectability criteria. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of radiological SpA involvement in PDAC of the body and tail.

methodsPreoperative computed tomography images of patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for resectable PDAC of the body and tail (n = 242) at our hospital between 2004 and 2018 were graded according to splenic vessel involvement status as clear, abutment, or encasement. Clinicopathological prognostic factors and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were compared between the three groups. The prognostic value of radiological involvement status was assessed using Harrell's concordance statistic (C-index) and time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and compared with pathological findings.

resultsThe diagnostic concordance rate was 0.87 (weighted κ statistic). Prognosis worsened with progression from clear, abutment, to encasement status. SpA encasement (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, p = 0.04) predicted poor OS in multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis. SpA abutment (HR 1.77, p = 0.017) and encasement (HR 1.86, p = 0.034) independently predicted poor RFS. Splenic vein abutment and encasement were not significant predictors of poor OS or RFS. SpA encasement without adjuvant chemotherapy had the poorest prognosis because of early distant metastasis. The prognostic value was higher for radiological SpA involvement than for pathological SpA invasion.

conclusionsRadiological SpA involvement status is a meaningful and reproducible prognostic indicator that can be used preoperatively for determining the treatment strategy in PDAC of the body and tail.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisSplenic ArterySurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID35691957
OpenAlexW4281934106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.