ArticleSpatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology2022
Validating a spatio-temporal model of observed neighborhood physical disorder.
Article in Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Built Environment Audits Across Space and Time for Estimating Time-Varying Exposures: Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Residential Context and Survival Disparities in Black and White Women With Ovarian Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Incorporating polygenic risk scores and social determinants of health across populations: Considerations and best practices in research.American journal of human genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study tested spatio-temporal model prediction accuracy and concurrent validity of observed neighborhood physical disorder collected from virtual audits of Google Street View streetscapes. We predicted physical disorder from spatio-temporal regression Kriging models based on measures at three dates per each of 256 streestscapes (n = 768 data points) across an urban area. We assessed model internal validity through cross validation and external validity through Pearson correlations with respondent-reported perceptions of physical disorder from a breast cancer survivor cohort. We compared validity among full models (both large- and small-scale spatio-temporal trends) versus large-scale only. Full models yielded lower prediction error compared to large-scale only models. Physical disorder predictions were lagged at uniform distances and dates away from the respondent-reported perceptions of physical disorder. Correlations between perceived and observed physical disorder predicted from the full model were higher compared to that of the large-scale only model, but only at locations and times closest to the respondent's exact residential address and questionnaire date. A spatio-temporal Kriging model of observed physical disorder is valid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.