Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35691613›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2022

A daily temperature rhythm in the human brain predicts survival after brain injury.

Nina M Rzechorzek, Michael J Thrippleton, Francesca M Chappell, Grant Mair, Ari Ercole, Manuel Cabeleira, CENTER-TBI High Resolution ICU (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators, Jonathan Rhodes, Ian Marshall, John S O'Neill

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The energy resistance principle.Cell metabolism · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. PERspectives on circadian cell biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nina M RzechorzekMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3209-5019
Michael J ThrippletonEdinburgh Imaging (Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) Facility, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7858-9917
Francesca M ChappellCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7742-1757
Grant MairEdinburgh Imaging (Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) Facility, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2189-443X
Ari ErcoleDivision of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Box 93 Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8350-8093
Manuel CabeleiraDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Box 167, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1710-6544
CENTER-TBI High Resolution ICU (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators
Jonathan RhodesDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, NHS Lothian, Room No. S8208 (2nd Floor), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2015-4579
Ian MarshallEdinburgh Imaging (Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) Facility, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4445-1551
John S O'NeillMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2204-6096
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBNHS Lothian · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/S022023/1Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/4The Dunhill Medical Trust R380R/1114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients undergo interventions to achieve a 'normal' brain temperature; a parameter that remains undefined for humans. The profound sensitivity of neuronal function to temperature implies the brain should be isothermal, but observations from patients and non-human primates suggest significant spatiotemporal variation. We aimed to determine the clinical relevance of brain temperature in patients by establishing how much it varies in healthy adults. We retrospectively screened data for all patients recruited to the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) High Resolution Intensive Care Unit Sub-Study. Only patients with direct brain temperature measurements and without targeted temperature management were included. To interpret patient analyses, we prospectively recruited 40 healthy adults (20 males, 20 females, 20-40 years) for brain thermometry using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Participants were scanned in the morning, afternoon, and late evening of a single day. In patients (n = 114), brain temperature ranged from 32.6 to 42.3°C and mean brain temperature (38.5 ± 0.8°C) exceeded body temperature (37.5 ± 0.5°C, P < 0.0001). Of 100 patients eligible for brain temperature rhythm analysis, 25 displayed a daily rhythm, and the brain temperature range decreased in older patients (P = 0.018). In healthy participants, brain temperature ranged from 36.1 to 40.9°C; mean brain temperature (38.5 ± 0.4°C) exceeded oral temperature (36.0 ± 0.5°C) and was 0.36°C higher in luteal females relative to follicular females and males (P = 0.0006 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Temperature increased with age, most notably in deep brain regions (0.6°C over 20 years, P = 0.0002), and varied spatially by 2.41 ± 0.46°C with highest temperatures in the thalamus. Brain temperature varied by time of day, especially in deep regions (0.86°C, P = 0.0001), and was lowest at night. From the healthy data we built HEATWAVE-a 4D map of human brain temperature. Testing the clinical relevance of HEATWAVE in patients, we found that lack of a daily brain temperature rhythm increased the odds of death in intensive care 21-fold (P = 0.016), whilst absolute temperature maxima or minima did not predict outcome. A warmer mean brain temperature was associated with survival (P = 0.035), however, and ageing by 10 years increased the odds of death 11-fold (P = 0.0002). Human brain temperature is higher and varies more than previously assumed-by age, sex, menstrual cycle, brain region, and time of day. This has major implications for temperature monitoring and management, with daily brain temperature rhythmicity emerging as one of the strongest single predictors of survival after brain injury. We conclude that daily rhythmic brain temperature variation-not absolute brain temperature-is one way in which human brain physiology may be distinguished from pathophysiology.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticHypothermia, InducedAdultAgedBody TemperatureBrainFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTemperaturebrain injurybrain temperaturebrain thermometrydailymortality

Identifiers

PMID35691613
PMCPMC9336587
OpenAlexW4206191476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.