Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35691612›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2022

Affordability influences nutritional quality of seafood consumption among income and race/ethnicity groups in the United States.

David C Love, Andrew L Thorne-Lyman, Zach Conrad, Jessica A Gephart, Frank Asche, Dakoury Godo-Solo, Acree McDowell, Elizabeth M Nussbaumer, Martin W Bloem

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David C LoveJohns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2606-8623
Andrew L Thorne-LymanJohns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Zach ConradDepartment of Kinesiology, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
Jessica A GephartDepartment of Environmental Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Frank AscheSchool of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences and Food Systems Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Dakoury Godo-SoloDepartment of Environmental Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Acree McDowellDepartment of Kinesiology, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
Elizabeth M NussbaumerJohns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Martin W BloemJohns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USAmerican University · USWilliam & Mary · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2020 US Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend that the US population consume more seafood. Most analyses of seafood consumption ignore heterogeneity in consumption patterns by species, nutritional content, production methods, and price, which have implications for applying recommendations.

objectivesWe assessed seafood intake among adults by socioeconomic and demographic groups, as well as the cost of seafood at retail to identify affordable and nutritious options.

methodsNHANES 2011-2018 dietary data (n = 17,559 total, n = 3285 eating seafood) were used to assess adult (≥20 y) intake of seafood in relation to income and race/ethnicity. Multivariable linear regression assessed the association between seafood consumption and income, adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity, and the association between nutrients and seafood price, using Nielsen 2017-2019 retail sales data, adjusted for sales volume.

resultsLow-income groups consume slightly less seafood than high-income groups [low income: mean 120.2 (95% CI: 103.5, 137.2) g/wk; high income: 141.8 (119.1, 164.1) g/wk] but substantially less seafood that is high in long-chain n-3 (ω-3) PUFAs [lower income: 21.3 (17.3, 25.5) g/wk; higher income: 46.8 (35.4, 57.8) g/wk]. Intake rates, species, and production method choices varied by race/ethnicity groups and within race/ethnicity groups by income. Retail seafood as a whole costs more than other protein foods (e.g., meat, poultry, eggs, beans), and fresh seafood high in n-3 PUFAs costs more (P < 0.002) than fresh seafood low in n-3 PUFAs. Retail seafood is available in a wide range of price points and product forms, and some lower-cost fish and shellfish were high in n-3 PUFAs, calcium, iron, selenium, and vitamins B-12 and D.

conclusionsNew insights into the relation between seafood affordability and consumption patterns among income and ethnicity groups suggest that specific policies and interventions may be needed to enhance the consumption of seafood by different groups.

Indexed as

EthnicityFatty Acids, Omega-3AnimalsCosts and Cost AnalysisDietHumansNutrition SurveysNutritive ValueSeafoodUnited StatesFatty Acids, Omega-3affordabilitydietfishn–3NHANESPUFAseafood

Identifiers

PMID35691612
PMCPMC9348982
OpenAlexW4226192159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.