ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2022
The Prevalence of Retinal Disease and Associated CNS Disease in Young Patients with Incontinentia Pigmenti.
Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consensus Guidance for Screening, Classification, and Treatment of Retinopathy Associated with Incontinentia Pigmenti.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Prevalence and clinical characteristics of incontinentia pigmenti: a nationwide population-based study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Ectodermal Dysplasia - An Overview and Update.Indian dermatology online journalReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
31 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the prevalence of retinal disease on fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with incontinentia pigmenti (IP) and to compare the severity of retinal disease in those with and without known central nervous system (CNS) disease.
designMulti-institutional consecutive retrospective case series. SUBJECTS: New patients with a diagnosis of IP were seen at the Casey Eye Institute at the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, or Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami from December 2011 to September 2018.
methodsDetailed ophthalmoscopic examination and FA were recommended for all new patients and performed on every patient who had parental consent. Ophthalmoscopic findings and FA images were graded for severity by 2 masked graders on a 3-point scale: 0 = no disease, 1 = vascular abnormalities without leakage, 2 = leakage or neovascularization, and 3 = retinal detachment. The presence of known CNS disease was documented. Additional cases were obtained from a pediatric retina listserv for examples of phenotypic variation.
main outcome measuresThe proportion of eyes noted to have disease on ophthalmoscopy compared with FA and the severity of retinal disease in those with and without known CNS disease.
resultsRetinal pathology was detected in 18 of 35 patients (51%) by indirect ophthalmoscopy and 26 of 35 patients (74%) by FA (P = 0.048) in a predominantly pediatric population (median age, 9 months). Ten patients (29%) had known CNS disease at the time of the eye examination. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test indicated that the retinal severity scores for patients with CNS disease (median, 2) were significantly higher than the retinal severity scores for patients without CNS disease (median, 1), z = -2.12, P = 0.034.
conclusionsRetinal disease is present in the majority of patients with IP, and ophthalmoscopic examination is less sensitive than FA for detection of disease. There may be a correlation between the severity of retinal and CNS disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.