Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35691295›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2022

Safety and immunogenicity of the FINLAY-FR-1A vaccine in COVID-19 convalescent participants: an open-label phase 2a and double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b, seamless, clinical trial.

Rolando Ochoa-Azze, Arturo Chang-Monteagudo, Yanet Climent-Ruiz, Consuelo Macías-Abraham, Carmen Valenzuela-Silva, María de Los Ángeles García-García, Yanet Jerez-Barceló, Yenisey Triana-Marrero, Laura Ruiz-Villegas, Luis Dairon Rodríguez-Prieto and 20 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Rolando Ochoa-AzzeFinlay Vaccine Institute, Atabey, Playa, Havana, Cuba. Electronic address: ochoa@finlay.edu.cu.
Arturo Chang-MonteagudoNational Institute of Hematology and Immunology, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
Yanet Climent-RuizFinlay Vaccine Institute, Atabey, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Consuelo Macías-AbrahamNational Institute of Hematology and Immunology, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
Carmen Valenzuela-SilvaInstitute of Cybernetics, Mathematics and Physics, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
María de Los Ángeles García-GarcíaNational Institute of Hematology and Immunology, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
Yanet Jerez-BarcelóNational Institute of Hematology and Immunology, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
Yenisey Triana-MarreroNational Institute of Hematology and Immunology, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
Laura Ruiz-VillegasNational Institute of Hematology and Immunology, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
Luis Dairon Rodríguez-PrietoNational Institute of Hematology and Immunology, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
Pedro Pablo Guerra-ChavianoNational Coordinating Centre of Clinical Trials, Miramar, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Belinda Sánchez-RamírezCentre of Molecular Immunology, Siboney, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Tays Hernández-GarcíaCentre of Molecular Immunology, Siboney, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Ivette Orosa-VázquezCentre of Molecular Immunology, Siboney, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Marianniz Díaz-HernándezCentre of Molecular Immunology, Siboney, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Fabrizio ChiodoFinlay Vaccine Institute, Atabey, Playa, Havana, Cuba; Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands and Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council, Pozzuoli, Napoli, Italy.
Andrea CalcagnoUnit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Valeria GhisettiLaboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, ASL, Turin, Italy.
Mireida Rodríguez-AcostaResearch Centre of Civil Defence, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba.
Enrique Noa-RomeroResearch Centre of Civil Defence, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba.
Juliet Enríquez-PuertasResearch Centre of Civil Defence, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba.
Darién Ortega-LeónImmunoassay Centre, Cubanacán, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Irinia Valdivia-ÁlvarezImmunoassay Centre, Cubanacán, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Aurora Delahanty-FernándezImmunoassay Centre, Cubanacán, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Ariel Palenzuela-DíazImmunoassay Centre, Cubanacán, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Laura Rodríguez-NodaFinlay Vaccine Institute, Atabey, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Raúl González-MugicaFinlay Vaccine Institute, Atabey, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Yury Valdés-BalbínFinlay Vaccine Institute, Atabey, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Dagmar García-RiveraFinlay Vaccine Institute, Atabey, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Vicente Verez-BencomoFinlay Vaccine Institute, Atabey, Playa, Havana, Cuba.
Finlay Institute · CUInstituto de Hematología e Inmunología · CUCenter of Molecular Immunology (Cuba) · CUCuban Neuroscience Center · CUInstituto de Cibernética Matemática y Física · CUOspedale Amedeo di Savoia · ITUniversity of Turin · ITVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA phase 1, clinical trial to evaluate FINLAY-FR-1A vaccine in COVID-19 convalescent individuals was completed. Here, we report results of the phase 2, clinical trial.

methodsWe studied 450 convalescent participants with a history of asymptomatic, mild, or moderate COVID-19 at the National Institute of Hematology and Immunology and the National Centre for Sexual Education in Havana, Cuba. The study included adults aged 19-78 years who had recovered from COVID-19 and had had a negative PCR test at least 2 months before the initiation of the study. Phase 2 was done sequentially in two stages. The first stage to assess safety comprised an open, non-controlled phase 2a study in participants aged 60-78 years who received a single dose of the FINLAY-FR-1A vaccine (50 μg of recombinant dimeric receptor binding domain [RBD]). The second stage comprised the placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2b trial in participants aged 19-78 years, where participants were randomly assigned (4:1) into two groups: an experimental group vaccinated with a single dose of the FINLAY-FR-1A vaccine, and a control (placebo) group injected with vaccine excipient. The primary outcomes were safety, evaluated 28 days after vaccination by the occurrence of serious adverse events in all participants, and successful immune response, assessed by neutralising antibody ELISA, and defined as half-maximal surrogate virus neutralisation titres of 250 or more. Secondary endpoints included vaccine immunogenicity assessed by ELISA anti-RBD and live-virus neutralisation test. All randomly assigned participants were included in the safety analysis (safety population), and immunogenicity was evaluated in participants without study interruptions (per-protocol population). The trial is registered with the Cuban Public Registry of Clinical Trials, RPCEC00000366-En and WHO-ICTRP and is complete.

findingsFrom April 9, 2021, to April 17, 2021, 663 COVID-19 convalescent participants were enrolled in the study; 213 participants did not meet the selection criteria and 450 volunteers were recruited. 20 participants aged 60-78 years were included in the open, single-group, phase 2a study and 430 participants were randomly assigned to the experimental (n=344) or control groups (n=86) in the phase 2b study of participants aged 19-78 years. 19 (95%) of 20 phase 2a volunteers achieved a successful immune response after vaccination. No vaccine-associated serious adverse events were reported in the whole study population. Minor adverse events were found, the most common being pain at the injection site (105 [29%] of 364 in the intervention group; 13 [15%] of 86 in the placebo group). A successful immune response was found in 289 (81%) of 358 participants 28 days after vaccination. The vaccine elicited a greater than 31-times increase in anti-RBD-IgG antibodies compared with prevaccination rates, and the seroconversion rate was 302 (84%) of 358 on day 28 after vaccination; the geometric mean titres of live-virus neutralisation test increased from 15·4 (95% CI 10·3-23·2) to 400·3 (272·4-588·1) and high response was found against alpha, beta, and delta variants of concern.

interpretationA single dose of the FINLAY-FR-1A vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 strengthened the pre-existing natural immunity, with excellent safety profile.

fundingCuba's Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35691295
PMCPMC9183216
OpenAlexW4281670396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.