Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35691008›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of health planning and management2022

Centralization and innovation: Competing priorities for health systems?

Andrew D Scarffe, Alison Coates, Jenna M Evans, Agnes Grudniewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of health planning and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diabetes On Track: Redesigning Diabetes Management in Rural Primary Care.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Centralization and innovation: Competing priorities for health systems?The International journal of health planning and management · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew D ScarffeTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8152-2083
Alison CoatesTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2023-9997
Jenna M EvansDeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3104-9889
Agnes GrudniewiczTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2960-8178

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, there has been a trend in Canada to centralise the provision of health services that were previously administratively and fiscally decentralised. Canadian policy rhetoric on centralisation often identifies improved innovation as an anticipated outcome. This paper challenges the assumed relationship between centralisation and innovation. We incorporate evidence from the management literature into the debate on the structure of health systems to explore the effects that centralisation is likely to have on innovation in health systems. The findings of this paper will be of interest to international policymakers, who are currently grappling with the prospect of maintaining a decentralised approach or adopting a more centralised health system structure in the future.

Indexed as

Health ServicesCanadaOrganizational Innovationcentralisationhealth systemsinnovationmanagementorganizational structure

Identifiers

PMID35691008
PMCPMC9546220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.