ReviewIntensive care medicine2022
The physiological underpinnings of life-saving respiratory support.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06490523 (Analysis of Advanced Physiological Ventilatory Parameters During Spontaneous Breathing Effort in Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analysis of Advanced Physiological Ventilatory Parameters During Spontaneous Breathing Effort in Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Emerging roles of mechanosensitive ion channels in ventilator induced lung injury: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Predictors of extubation failure in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Time-controlled adaptive ventilation in patients with ARDS-lack of protocol adherence: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Model for Predicting Postoperative Hyperlactatemia in Young Children Following Congenital Heart Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Mechanical power of ventilation: tracking the damaging component.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Pneumonia in Immunocompromised ICU Patients: A Retrospective Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Patterns and outcomes of real-world high-flow nasal cannula use: a multi-hospital retrospective cohort study.Critical care science · 2026Observational
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically Ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in mechanical ventilation for critically ill patients: strategies for respiratory support and complication management.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Prognosis of intensive care unit patients with colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Real-time detection of respiratory circuit events in mechanical ventilation using deep learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A video-based approach to decipher intubation decisions for the critically ill.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical practice of one-lung ventilation in mainland China: a nationwide questionnaire survey.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Alveolar epithelial cells in bacterial sepsis-associated acute lung injury: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Article
- [Focus on ventilation, oxygen therapy and weaning 2022-2024 : Summary of selected intensive care studies].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024Article
- Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of patients with septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of respiratory failure has improved dramatically since the polio epidemic in the 1950s with the use of invasive techniques for respiratory support: mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal respiratory support. However, respiratory support is only a supportive therapy, designed to "buy time" while the disease causing respiratory failure abates. It ensures viable gas exchange and prevents cardiorespiratory collapse in the context of excessive loads. Because the use of invasive modalities of respiratory support is also associated with substantial harm, it remains the responsibility of the clinician to minimize such hazards. Direct iatrogenic consequences of mechanical ventilation include the risk to the lung (ventilator-induced lung injury) and the diaphragm (ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction and other forms of myotrauma). Adverse consequences on hemodynamics can also be significant. Indirect consequences (e.g., immobilization, sleep disruption) can have devastating long-term effects. Increasing awareness and understanding of these mechanisms of injury has led to a change in the philosophy of care with a shift from aiming to normalize gases toward minimizing harm. Lung (and more recently also diaphragm) protective ventilation strategies include the use of extracorporeal respiratory support when the risk of ventilation becomes excessive. This review provides an overview of the historical background of respiratory support, pathophysiology of respiratory failure and rationale for respiratory support, iatrogenic consequences from mechanical ventilation, specifics of the implementation of mechanical ventilation, and role of extracorporeal respiratory support. It highlights the need for appropriate monitoring to estimate risks and to individualize ventilation and sedation to provide safe respiratory support to each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.