ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2022
Diurnal rhythm of human semen quality: analysis of large-scale human sperm bank data and timing-controlled laboratory study.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- An update on the role and potential mechanisms of clock genes regulating spermatogenesis: A systematic review of human and animal experimental studies.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Investigations on semen analysis capabilities and quality control measures in laboratories with different management modes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Circadian disruption impairs Leydig cell maturation and reproductive development in male rats.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- GlycoIP: an integrated platform for simultaneous and site-specificFrontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- Do different male infertility factors impact embryological, cumulative pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in IVF/ICSI cycles? A retrospective cohort study.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
- A time for sex: circadian regulation of mammalian sexual and reproductive function.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Time of day modified the time required for semen collection with electroejaculation and slightly affected the quality of fresh semen in rams.Tropical animal health and production · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionCan we identify diurnal oscillations in human semen parameters as well as peak times of semen quality? SUMMARY ANSWER: Human semen parameters show substantial diurnal oscillation, with most parameters reaching a peak between 1100 and 1500 h. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A circadian clock appears to regulate different physiological functions in various organs, but it remains controversial whether diurnal rhythms occur in human semen parameters. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The medical record of a provincial human sperm bank (HSB) with 33 430 semen samples collected between 0800 and 1700 h from 1 March 2010 to 8 July 2015 was used to analyze variation in semen parameters among time points. A laboratory study was conducted to collect semen samples (n = 36) from six volunteers at six time points with identical time intervals (2 days plus 4 h) between 6 June and 8 July in 2019, in order to investigate the diurnal oscillation of semen parameters in vivo, with a strictly controlled abstinence period. Therefore, the sperm bank study with a large sample size and the in vivo study with a strictly controlled abstinence period in a 24-h time window could be compared to describe the diurnal rhythms in human semen parameters. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsSamples were obtained from potential HSB donors and from participants in the laboratory study who were volunteers, recruited by flyers distributed in the community. Total sperm count, sperm concentration, semen volume, progressive motility and total motility were assessed using computer-aided sperm analysis. In addition, sperm chromatin integrity parameters (DNA fragmentation index and high DNA stainability) were assessed by the sperm chromatin structure assay, and sperm viability was measured with flow cytometry in the laboratory study. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The 33 430 samples from the HSB showed a temporal variation in total sperm count, sperm concentration, semen volume, progressive motility and total motility (all P < 0.001) between 0800 and 1700 h. Consequently, the eligibility of semen samples for use in ART, based on bank standards, fluctuated with time point. Each hour earlier/later than 1100 h was associated with 1.14-fold risk of ineligibility. Similarly, the 36 samples taken during the 24-h time window showed diurnal oscillation. With the pre-collection abstinence period strictly controlled, most semen parameters reached the most favorable level between 1100 and 1500 h. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Some of the possible confounding factors, such as energy intake, which might influence semen quality or diurnal rhythms, were not adjusted for in the analyses. In addition, the findings should be considered with caution because the study was conducted in a specific population, time and place, while the timing of oscillations could differ with changing conditions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe findings could help us to estimate semen quality more precisely and to obtain higher quality sperm for use in ART and in natural conception. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871208) and National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1002001). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.