Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690884›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2022

Cognitive subgroups and their longitudinal trajectories in bipolar disorder.

Tobin J Ehrlich, Kelly A Ryan, Katherine E Burdick, Scott A Langenecker, Melvin G McInnis, David F Marshall

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bipolar disorder.Lancet (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tobin J EhrlichHeinz C Prechter Bipolar Research Program, Eisenberg Family Depression Center, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8066-2044
Kelly A RyanHeinz C Prechter Bipolar Research Program, Eisenberg Family Depression Center, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Katherine E BurdickDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Scott A LangeneckerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Melvin G McInnisHeinz C Prechter Bipolar Research Program, Eisenberg Family Depression Center, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
David F MarshallHeinz C Prechter Bipolar Research Program, Eisenberg Family Depression Center, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCognitive functioning in bipolar disorder is heterogeneous with evidence for multiple subgroups. However, cognitive subgroup change patterns over time remains unknown. While prior work suggests minimal differences in cognitive functioning patterns over time between those with bipolar disorder and controls, group-based analyses may obscure unique subgroup-based changes. MATERIAL AND

methodsParticipants diagnosed with bipolar disorder (I, II, NOS; n = 568) and unaffected controls (n = 234) completed baseline, one- and five-year neuropsychological assessments. Data reduction techniques were used to limit the number of neuropsychological variables. Bipolar disorder participant baseline neuropsychological data were entered into hierarchical cluster analyses and resultant clusters were entered in multilevel models, which tested for differences in baseline and longitudinal cognitive changes in cognition among the cluster groups and with controls.

resultsResults were consistent with bipolar disorder participants forming three subgroups with high (n = 209), mid (n = 259), and low (n = 100) cognition. These groups were associated with unique clinical characteristics. Multilevel models demonstrated that over a five-year period, the low group improved, relative to the high and mid groups, and with controls, in auditory memory. Over the five-year period, the mid group, in comparison with the high group, improved in visual memory; additionally, the high group remained stable, in comparison with a slight decline in the control group, in inhibitory control.

conclusionThese results demonstrate that cognition-based subgroups of bipolar disorder participants have minimal differences in their longitudinal course in relation to each other and with unaffected controls.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderCognition DisordersCognitionHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeuropsychological Testsbipolar disordercognitionhierarchical clusteringlongitudinal modeling

Identifiers

PMID35690884
PMCPMC9545624
OpenAlexW4281931252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.