Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690880›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2022

HIV testing and linkage to ART following secondary distribution of HIV self-test kits to male partners of women living with HIV: a pilot randomized control trial in Mpumalanga, South Africa.

Dvora L Joseph Davey, Kristin M Wall, Nireshni Naidoo, Dhirisha Naidoo, Gugu Xaba, Claire Serao, Todd Malone, Kathryn Dovel

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dvora L Joseph DaveyDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6290-9293
Kristin M WallDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8547-2004
Nireshni NaidooBroadReach Healthcare, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Dhirisha NaidooBroadReach Healthcare, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Gugu XabaBroadReach Healthcare, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Claire SeraoBroadReach Healthcare, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Todd MaloneBroadReach Healthcare, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kathryn DovelDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-3401
BroadReach Healthcare (South Africa) · ZAEmory University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Evaluation of pre-exposure prophylaxis cascade in pregnant and breastfeeding women in Cape Town, South AfricaK01TW011187 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOSEPH DAVEY, DVORA LEAH · 2018 to 2022
$698k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW011187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSouth African men are underrepresented in HIV testing and treatment services. Secondary distribution of oral HIV self-test (HIVST) kits by women living with HIV (WLHIV) to their male partners (i.e. index partner HIVST) may increase men's testing and treatment but has been understudied.

methodsBetween March and July 2021, we evaluated the effectiveness of index partner HIVST versus the standard of care (SOC) (invitations for men's facility-based testing) on men's testing in a 1:1 randomized control trial. Eligibility criteria included: WLHIV; ≥18 years of age; attending one of four high-density rural clinics; have a working cell phone; and self-reported having a primary male partner of unknown serostatus. The primary outcome was the proportion of WLHIV reporting that her partner tested for HIV within 3 months after enrolment.

resultsWe enrolled 180 WLHIV and 176 completed an endline survey (mean age = 35 years, 15% pregnant, 47% unmarried or non-cohabiting). In the HIVST arm, 78% of male partners were reported to have tested for HIV versus 55% in SOC (RR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.14-1.76). In the HIVST arm, nine men were reactive with HIVST (14% positivity), six were confirmed HIV positive with standard testing (67%) and all of those started antiretroviral therapy (ART), and four HIV-negative men started pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (5%). In SOC, six men were diagnosed with HIV (12% positivity), 100% started ART and seven HIV-negative men started PrEP (16%). One case of verbal intimate partner violence was reported in the HIVST arm.

conclusionsSecondary distribution of HIVST to partners of WLHIV was acceptable and effective for improving HIV testing among men in rural South Africa in our pilot study. Interventions are needed to link reactive HIVST users to confirmatory testing and ART.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsAdultFemaleHIV TestingHumansMaleMass ScreeningPilot ProjectsPregnancySelf CareSelf-TestingSouth AfricaHIV self-testingHIV testingindex testingmenSouth Africawomen living with HIV

Identifiers

PMID35690880
PMCPMC9188623
OpenAlexW4281919757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.