Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690842›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2022

Single_cell_GRN: gene regulatory network identification based on supervised learning method and Single-cell RNA-seq data.

Bin Yang, Wenzheng Bao, Baitong Chen, Dan Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Effective Pruning for Top-k Feature Search on the Basis of SHAP Values.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bin YangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang, 277160, China.
Wenzheng BaoSchool of Information and Electrical Engineering, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou, 221018, China. baowz55555@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-5432
Baitong ChenXuzhou First People's Hospital, Xuzhou, 221000, China.
Dan SongSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang, 277160, China. songdan@uzz.edu.cn.

Funding

Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province SBK2019040953National Science Foundation of China 61902337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-seq overcomes the shortcomings of conventional transcriptome sequencing technology and could provide a powerful tool for distinguishing the transcriptome characteristics of various cell types in biological tissues, and comprehensively revealing the heterogeneity of gene expression between cells. Many Intelligent Computing methods have been presented to infer gene regulatory network (GRN) with single-cell RNA-seq data. In this paper, we investigate the performances of seven classifiers including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), Naive Bayesian (NB), GBDT, logical regression (LR), decision tree (DT) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) for solving the binary classification problems of GRN inference with single-cell RNA-seq data (Single_cell_GRN). In SVM, three different kernel functions (linear, polynomial and radial basis function) are utilized, respectively. Three real single-cell RNA-seq datasets from mouse and human are utilized. The experiment results prove that in most cases supervised learning methods (SVM, RF, NB, GBDT, LR, DT and KNN) perform better than unsupervised learning method (GENIE3) in terms of AUC. SVM, RF and KNN have the better performances than other four classifiers. In SVM, linear and polynomial kernels are more fit to model single-cell RNA-seq data.

Indexed as

ClassificationGene regulatory networkRAN-seqSingle-cellSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID35690842
PMCPMC9188720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.