Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690797›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Neuropsychological evaluation and rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis (NEuRoMS): protocol for a mixed-methods, multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Gogem Topcu, Laura Smith, Jacqueline R Mhizha-Murira, Nia Goulden, Zoë Hoare, Avril Drummond, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Nikos Evangelou, Klaus Schmierer, Emma C Tallantyre and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Gogem TopcuMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-5686
Laura SmithSchool of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3275-1530
Jacqueline R Mhizha-MuriraMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1976-0195
Nia GouldenNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health Clinical Trials Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-3987
Zoë HoareNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health Clinical Trials Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1803-5482
Avril DrummondSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-8354
Deborah FitzsimmonsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, School of Health and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7286-8410
Nikos EvangelouMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-0672
Klaus SchmiererCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9293-8893
Emma C TallantyreDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3760-6634
Paul LeightonCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5208-0274
Kimberley Allen-PhilbeyCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1207-8625
Andrea StennettWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0881-022X
Paul BradleyDepartment of Neurology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-9932
Clare BaleMultiple Sclerosis Patient and Public Involvement Group, Nottingham, UK.
James TurtonMultiple Sclerosis Patient and Public Involvement Group, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-0477
Roshan das NairMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. roshan.dasnair@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-7893
NEuRoMS Collective
University of Nottingham · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBBangor University · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBMultiple Sclerosis Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research RP-PG-0218-20002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive problems affect up to 70% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS), which can negatively impact mood, ability to work, and quality of life. Addressing cognitive problems is a top 10 research priority for people with MS. Our ongoing research has systematically developed a cognitive screening and management pathway (NEuRoMS) tailored for people with MS, involving a brief cognitive evaluation and rehabilitation intervention. The present study aims to assess the feasibility of delivering the pathway and will inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the intervention and eventually guide its clinical implementation.

methodsThe feasibility study is in three parts. Part 1 involves an observational study of those who receive screening and support for cognitive problems, using routinely collected clinical data. Part 2 is a two-arm, parallel group, multicentre, feasibility RCT with a nested fidelity evaluation. This part will evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a definitive trial comparing the NEuRoMS intervention plus usual care to usual care only, amongst people with MS with mild cognitive problems (n = 60). In part 3, semi-structured interviews will be undertaken with participants from part 2 (n = 25), clinicians (n = 9), and intervention providers (n = 3) involved in delivering the NEuRoMS cognitive screening and management pathway. MS participants will be recruited from outpatient clinics at three UK National Health Service hospitals. DISCUSSION: Timely screening and effective management of cognitive problems in MS are urgently needed due to the detrimental consequences of cognitive problems on people with MS, the healthcare system, and wider society. The NEuRoMS intervention is based on previous and extant literature and has been co-constructed with relevant stakeholders. If effective, the NEuRoMS pathway will facilitate timely identification and management of cognitive problems in people with MS.

trial registrationISRCTN11203922 . Prospectively registered on 09.02.2021.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive screeningFeasibility studyMultiple sclerosisRandomised controlled trialRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35690797
PMCPMC9187894
OpenAlexW4282943067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.