Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690773›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy plus anti-PD1 versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.

Jian-Xu Li, Wen-Xiang Deng, Shi-Ting Huang, Xiao-Feng Lin, Mei-Ying Long, Jie Zhang, Ting-Shi Su, Li-Qing Li, Ya-Dan Pang, Chun-Feng Liang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian-Xu Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Wen-Xiang Deng *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Shi-Ting HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Xiao-Feng LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Mei-Ying LongSchool of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Ting-Shi SuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Li-Qing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Ya-Dan PangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Chun-Feng LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Hong-Mei ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Hai-Yan LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Shi-Xiong LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China.
Bang-De XiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China. xiangbangde@gxmu.edu.cn.
Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de la Provincia de Córdoba Z20201371the Development and Application Project for the Appropriate Technology of Health of Guangxi Province S2019039the Youth Program of Scientific Research Foundation of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital 2021-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than sorafenib or TACE monotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) plus monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) versus TACE plus sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC.

methodsPatients with advanced HCC who treated with RT plus anti-PD1 and TACE plus sorafenib were enrolled. Objective response rate (ORR), PFS, disease control rate (DCR) and OS were calculated to assess the antitumor response and the treatment-related adverse events to the safety.

resultsBetween January 2018 to March 2021, 37 patients underwent RT plus anti-PD1 and 41 patients underwent TACE plus sorafenib. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The ORR and DCR were significantly higher in the RT + PD1 group than the TACE plus sorafenib group according to RECIST 1.1 (54.05% vs. 12.20%, P < 0.001; 70.27% vs. 46.37%, P = 0.041; respectively) and according to mRECIST (56.76% vs. 31.71%, P = 0.039; 70.27% vs. 46.37%, P = 0.041; respectively). RT plus anti-PD1 provided significantly better PFS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.30-0.86; P = 0.017) than TACE plus sorafenib. Moreover, patients with RT plus anti-PD1 had significantly higher 3-, 6-, and 9-month OS rates than those with TACE plus sorafenib(97.3% vs. 92.30%, P < 0.001; 91.89% vs. 68.60%, P < 0.001; 75.5% vs. 60.60%, P < 0.001; respectively). The median OS was more favorable 17.4 months for the RT + PD1 group and 11.9 months for the TACE plus sorafenib group. No treatment-related death was observed. Grade 3 or more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred significantly less in patients in the RT + PD1 group than the TACE plus sorafenib group (29.7% vs. 75.6%, P < 0.001), and all TRAEs were manageable.

conclusionsIn this real-world study, RT plus anti-PD1 showed significantly promising efficacy and manageable safety than TACE plus sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. The study provides evidence on a new therapeutic method in the treatment of advanced HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHumansNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibAnti-PD1Hepatocellular carcinomaOverall survivalRadiotherapySorafenibTranscatheter arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID35690773
PMCPMC9188229
OpenAlexW4282930209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.