Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690648›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comprehensive comparison of treatments for controlling the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) in Central Europe.

Juraj Galko, Michal Lalík, Slavomír Rell, Christo Nikolov, Marek Barta, Ján Pittner, Silvia Hyblerová, Milan Zúbrik, Andrej Kunca, Jozef Vakula and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juraj GalkoNational Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Michal LalíkNational Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Slavomír RellNational Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Christo NikolovNational Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Marek BartaInstitute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Nitra, Slovakia.
Ján PittnerFaculty of Forestry, Technical University Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Silvia HyblerováResearch Station of TANAP, Tatranská Lomnica, Slovakia.
Milan ZúbrikNational Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Andrej KuncaNational Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Jozef VakulaNational Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Andrej GubkaNational Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Jaroslav HolušaFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. holusaj@seznam.cz.ORCID 0000-0003-1459-0331

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adults of the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) cause serious damage to coniferous seedlings and are among the most important forest pests in Europe. Seedling protection by chemicals is gradually being restricted or banned for environmental reasons, and non-chemical alternatives are therefore needed. In this 3-year study, we compared the following five treatments for protecting Norway spruce seedlings against H. abietis in the Central European mountains where the weevil is especially abundant: alpha-cypermethrin sprays (the only chemical treatment); coating with sprayed glue (Vermifix); wax coating with C and F types (Norsk Wax); and physical protection with collars. The same block design was set up at a clear-cut site and at a nursery site to compare seedling mortality and wax quality under "wild conditions" with pests and under "ideal conditions" without pests. Repeated application of alpha-cypermethrin was the most effective and least expensive method to protect seedlings against H. abietis. Among the four non-chemical methods, repeated application of glue was the most effective. Because collars were moderately effective but not cost-effective, we do not recommend the use of collars. Wax was inexpensive and environmentally safe but protected seedlings for only 1 year; the newer F type of wax performed better than the C type of wax, and perhaps the F type can be improved. In general we found that seedlings at sites with high numbers of H. abietis require protection for at least 3 years. We conclude by providing an overview of all methods currently available for managing H. abietis in forests.

Indexed as

PiceaPinusTracheophytaWeevilsAnimalsSeedlings

Identifiers

PMID35690648
PMCPMC9188549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.