Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690604›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hung-Lun Chen, Fu-An Yang, Ting-Hsuan Lee, Tsan-Hon Liou, Reuben Escorpizo, Hung-Chou Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06289218 (Kinesio Taping Versus Interferential Current Therapy in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06289218 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Kinesio Taping Versus Interferential Current Therapy in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: a Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled63ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsinterferential current, kinesio taping, exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hung-Lun ChenDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Fu-An YangSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Hsuan LeeDepartment of Family Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Tsan-Hon LiouDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 291 Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 235, Taiwan.
Reuben EscorpizoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Hung-Chou ChenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 291 Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 235, Taiwan. 10462@s.tmu.edu.tw.
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TWUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of interferential current therapy (IFC) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalKey, and Scopus for relevant studies from their date of launch to March 22, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which IFC was applied to knee osteoarthritis patients and the outcomes of pain scores or functional scales were assessed. Ten RCTs with 493 patients met the inclusion criteria. Nine RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The IFC groups exhibited significant improvements relative to the control groups for short-term pain scores (SMD = - 0.64, 95% CI - 1.04 to - 0.25, P = 0.001), long-term pain scores (SMD = - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.60 to - 0.11, P = 0.005), and short-term Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores (SMD = - 0.39, 95% CI - 0.77 to - 0.02, P = 0.04). All included studies did not observe any obvious adverse effects of IFC. IFC can be recommended as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis because it improves short- and long-term pain and short-term function. However, large-scale and high-quality RCTs with longer follow-up are required to establish an appropriate standardized treatment.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeHumansPainPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35690604
PMCPMC9188606
OpenAlexW4282913545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.