Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690591›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Uncovering individual differences in fine-scale dynamics of functional connectivity.

Sarah A Cutts, Joshua Faskowitz, Richard F Betzel, Olaf Sporns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The individuality of single-frame functional brain connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Variation in high-amplitude events across the human lifespan.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Living on the edge: network neuroscience beyond nodes.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah A CuttsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-8484
Joshua FaskowitzDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-7206
Richard F BetzelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
Olaf SpornsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESST32HD007475 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Patrick Kennedy, LINDA B. SMITH · 1995 to 2026
$9.5M
National Science Foundation IIS-2023985NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007475NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity (FC) profiles contain subject-specific features that are conserved across time and have potential to capture brain-behavior relationships. Most prior work has focused on spatial features (nodes and systems) of these FC fingerprints, computed over entire imaging sessions. We propose a method for temporally filtering FC, which allows selecting specific moments in time while also maintaining the spatial pattern of node-based activity. To this end, we leverage a recently proposed decomposition of FC into edge time series (eTS). We systematically analyze functional magnetic resonance imaging frames to define features that enhance identifiability across multiple fingerprinting metrics, similarity metrics, and data sets. Results show that these metrics characteristically vary with eTS cofluctuation amplitude, similarity of frames within a run, transition velocity, and expression of functional systems. We further show that data-driven optimization of features that maximize fingerprinting metrics isolates multiple spatial patterns of system expression at specific moments in time. Selecting just 10% of the data can yield stronger fingerprints than are obtained from the full data set. Our findings support the idea that FC fingerprints are differentially expressed across time and suggest that multiple distinct fingerprints can be identified when spatial and temporal characteristics are considered simultaneously.

Indexed as

BrainIndividualityBrain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingTime FactorsconnectomicsfMRIfunctional connectivityresting state

Identifiers

PMID35690591
PMCPMC12954447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.