ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2022
CondiS: A conditional survival distribution-based method for censored data imputation overcoming the hurdle in machine learning-based survival analysis.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Choosing Radiation Dose-volume Constraints on Cardio-pulmonary Substructures Associated with Overall Survival in NRG Oncology RTOG 0617.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023Trial
- Predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after hip and knee replacement surgery: study protocol for a comparison of modelling approaches using the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS).Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2025Review
- Survival parametric modeling for patients with heart failure based on Kernel learning.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- One-year survival prediction models following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A comparative analysis of the Cox Frailty Model and machine learning.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Making Sense of Censored Covariates: Statistical Methods for Studies of Huntington's Disease.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2024Article
- CondiS web app: imputation of censored lifetimes for machine learning-based survival analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data analyses by machine learning (ML) algorithms are gaining popularity in biomedical research. When time-to-event data are of interest, censoring is common and needs to be properly addressed. Most ML methods cannot conveniently and appropriately take the censoring information into consideration, potentially leading to inaccurate or biased results. We aim to develop a general-purpose method for imputing censored survival data, facilitating downstream ML analysis. In this study, we propose a novel method of imputing the survival times for censored observations. The proposal is based on their conditional survival distributions (CondiS) derived from Kaplan-Meier estimators. CondiS can replace censored observations with their best approximations from the statistical model, allowing for direct application of ML methods. When covariates are available, we extend CondiS by incorporating the covariate information through ML modeling (CondiS-X), which further improves the accuracy of the imputed survival time. Compared with existing methods with similar purposes, the proposed methods achieved smaller prediction errors and higher concordance with the underlying true survival times in extensive simulation studies. We also demonstrated the usage and advantages of the proposed methods through two real-world cancer datasets. The major advantage of CondiS is that it allows for the direct application of standard ML techniques for analysis once the censored survival times are imputed. We present a user-friendly R package to implement our method, which is a useful tool for ML-based biomedical research in this era of big data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.