ArticleContemporary clinical trials2022
SHARING Choices: Design and rationale for a pragmatic trial of an advance care planning intervention for older adults with and without dementia in primary care.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04819191 (Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients (SHARING Choices)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practice Variability in the SHARING Choices Pragmatic Trial of Primary Care Advance Care Planning.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Trial
- Qualitative evaluation of the SHARING Choices trial of primary care advance care planning for adults with and without dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Trial
- SHARING Choices: Lessons Learned from a Primary-Care Focused Advance Care Planning Intervention.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023Trial
- Feasibility of Using Simulation to Evaluate Implementation Fidelity in an Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2025Article
- Developing archetypes for key roles in a pragmatic trial: implementing human-centered design to promote advance care planning in primary care.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- Advancing the Research-to-Policy and Practice Pipeline in Aging and Dementia Care.The Public policy and aging report · 2023Article
- Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) and involving family are particularly important in dementia, and primary care is a key setting. The purpose of this trial is to examine the impact and implementation of SHARING Choices, an intervention to improve communication for older adults with and without dementia through proactively supporting ACP and family engagement in primary care.
methodsWe cluster-randomized 55 diverse primary care practices across two health systems to the intervention or usual care. SHARING Choices is a multicomponent intervention that aims to improve communication through patient and family engagement in ACP, agenda setting, and shared access to the patient portal for all patients over 65 years of age. The primary outcomes include documentation of an advance directive or medical orders for life-sustaining treatment in the electronic health record (EHR) at 12 months for all patients and receipt of potentially burdensome care within 6 months of death for the subgroup of patients with serious illness. We plan a priori sub-analysis for patients with dementia. Data sources include the health system EHRs and the Maryland health information exchange. We use a mixed-methods approach to evaluate uptake, fidelity and adaptation of the intervention and implementation facilitators and barriers.
conclusionsThis cluster-randomized pragmatic trial examines ACP with a focus on the key population of those with dementia, implementation in diverse settings and innovative approaches to trial design and outcome abstraction. Mixed-methods approaches enable understanding of intervention delivery and facilitators and barriers to implementation in rapidly changing health care systems. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT04819191.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.