Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35690182›Full record

ArticleFood and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association2022

Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin.

Heike Sprenger, Katrin Kreuzer, Jimmy Alarcan, Kristin Herrmann, Julia Buchmüller, Philip Marx-Stoelting, Albert Braeuning

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Application of HepaRG cells for genotoxicity assessment: a review.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heike SprengerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Dept. Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Katrin KreuzerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Dept. Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Jimmy AlarcanGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Dept. Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Kristin HerrmannGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Dept. Pesticides Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Julia BuchmüllerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Dept. Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Philip Marx-StoeltingGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Dept. Pesticides Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Albert BraeuningGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Dept. Food Safety, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Albert.Braeuning@bfr.bund.de.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicological risk assessment is essential in the evaluation and authorization of different classes of chemical substances. Genotoxicity and mutagenicity testing are of highest priority and rely on established in vitro systems with bacterial and mammalian cells, sometimes followed by in vivo testing using rodent animal models. Transcriptomic approaches have recently also shown their value to determine transcript signatures specific for genotoxicity. Here, we studied how transcriptomic data, in combination with in vitro tests with human cells, can be used for the identification of genotoxic properties of test compounds. To this end, we used liver samples from a 28-day oral toxicity study in rats with the pesticidal active substances imazalil, thiacloprid, and clothianidin, a neonicotinoid-type insecticide with, amongst others, known hepatotoxic properties. Transcriptomic results were bioinformatically evaluated and pointed towards a genotoxic potential of clothianidin. In vitro Comet and γH2AX assays in human HepaRG hepatoma cells, complemented by in silico analyses of mutagenicity, were conducted as follow-up experiments to check if the genotoxicity alert from the transcriptomic study is in line with results from a battery of guideline genotoxicity studies. Our results illustrate the combined use of toxicogenomics, classic toxicological data and new approach methods in risk assessment. By means of a weight-of-evidence decision, we conclude that clothianidin does most likely not pose genotoxic risks to humans.

Indexed as

MutagensTranscriptomeAnimalsDNA DamageGuanidinesHumansMammalsMutagenicity TestsNeonicotinoidsRatsRisk AssessmentThiazolesclothianidinGuanidinesMutagensNeonicotinoidsThiazolesClastogenicityGenotoxicityHepaRG cellsLiver toxicityPesticide

Identifiers

PMID35690182
PMCPMC9339662
OpenAlexW4281957051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.