Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35689935›Full record

ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2022

Risk Stratification Models for Stroke in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Infection.

Alexander E Merkler, Cenai Zhang, Ivan Diaz, Carolyn Stewart, Natalie M LeMoss, Saad Mir, Neal Parikh, Santosh Murthy, Ning Lin, Ajay Gupta and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alexander E MerklerClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: alm9097@med.cornell.edu.
Cenai ZhangClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: cez4001@med.cornell.edu.
Ivan DiazDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: ild2005@med.cornell.edu.
Carolyn StewartClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: crs4001@med.cornell.edu.
Natalie M LeMossClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: nml4001@med.cornell.edu.
Saad MirClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: sam9235@med.cornell.edu.
Neal ParikhClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: nsp2001@med.cornell.edu.
Santosh MurthyClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: sam9200@med.cornell.edu.
Ning LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: nil9028@med.cornell.edu.
Ajay GuptaDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: ajg9004@med.cornell.edu.
Costantino IadecolaClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: coi2001@med.cornell.edu.
Mitchell S V ElkindDepartment of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, United States. Electronic address: mse13@cumc.columbia.edu.
Hooman KamelClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: hok9010@med.cornell.edu.
Babak B NaviClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States. Electronic address: ban9003@med.cornell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo derive models that identify patients with COVID-19 at high risk for stroke. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used data from the AHA's Get With The Guidelines® COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry to generate models for predicting stroke risk among adults hospitalized with COVID-19 at 122 centers from March 2020-March 2021. To build our models, we used data on demographics, comorbidities, medications, and vital sign and laboratory values at admission. The outcome was a cerebrovascular event (stroke, TIA, or cerebral vein thrombosis). First, we used Cox regression with cross validation techniques to identify factors associated with the outcome in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Then, we assigned points for each variable based on corresponding coefficients to create a prediction score. Second, we used machine learning techniques to create risk estimators using all available covariates.

resultsAmong 21,420 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 312 (1.5%) had a cerebrovascular event. Using traditional Cox regression, we created/validated a COVID-19 stroke risk score with a C-statistic of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.60-0.72). The CANDLE score assigns 1 point each for prior cerebrovascular disease, afebrile temperature, no prior pulmonary disease, history of hypertension, leukocytosis, and elevated systolic blood pressure. CANDLE stratified risk of an acute cerebrovascular event according to low- (0-1: 0.2% risk), medium- (2-3: 1.1% risk), and high-risk (4-6: 2.1-3.0% risk) groups. Machine learning estimators had similar discriminatory performance as CANDLE: C-statistics, 0.63-0.69.

conclusionsWe developed a practical clinical score, with similar performance to machine learning estimators, to help stratify stroke risk among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19StrokeAdultHospitalizationHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCerebrovascular diseaseCOVID-19Intracerebral hemorrhageRisk-stratificationStroke

Identifiers

PMID35689935
PMCPMC9160015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.