Trial reportBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022
Independent validation of stromal uPA in ABCSG-08: Level 1b evidence for the prognostic value of uPA immunohistochemistry.
Trial report in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo validate the prognostic role of urokinase-type plasminogen-activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) protein expression in FFPE archived tumor samples when assessed by immunohistochemistry. PATIENTS AND
methodsFresh-frozen, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 303 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, early breast cancer were investigated. The patients had received 5 years of endocrine therapy in the prospectively randomized ABCSG-8 trial. Immunohistochemistry for stromal uPA and PAI-1 protein expression was correlated with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsWe detected stromal uPA in 132 of 297 tumors (44.4%) and stromal PAI-1 expression in 74 out of 299 samples (24.7%). Co-expression of uPA and PAI-1 was present in 48 of 294 (16.3%) cases. Neither uPA nor PAI-1 expression was associated with tumor size, age, nodal status, grading, or quantitative receptor status. Patients whose tumor stroma expressed uPA protein had a significantly shorter DRFS (adjusted HR for relapse: 2.78; 95% CI 1.31-5.93; p = 0.008 Cox regression analysis) than women without uPA expression. No such association was seen for PAI-1 and the uPA/PAI1 ratio. After a median follow-up of 5.6 years, women with uPA-positive tumors demonstrated significantly shorter DRFS (93.3% vs. 84.8%; p < 0.013 log-rank test), and tended to have a worse OS (83.0% vs. 77.3%; p = 0.106) compared to women with uPA negative tumors.
conclusionThis independent validation in archived tumor samples from a large prospective randomized trial confirms the clinical utility of stromal uPA evaluation by immunohistochemistry. This provides level 1b evidence for the prognostic role of stromal uPA in women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.