Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35689632›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2022

Microphysiological Systems Evaluation: Experience of TEX-VAL Tissue Chip Testing Consortium.

Ivan Rusyn, Courtney Sakolish, Yuki Kato, Clifford Stephan, Leoncio Vergara, Philip Hewitt, Vasanthi Bhaskaran, Myrtle Davis, Rhiannon N Hardwick, Stephen S Ferguson and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ToxPoint: Of hammers and nails-understanding academic challenges with "context of use" and "fit for purpose".Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Intestinal organ chips for disease modelling and personalized medicine.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ivan RusynDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Courtney SakolishDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Yuki KatoDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Clifford StephanInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Leoncio VergaraInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Philip HewittChemical and Preclinical Safety, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2741-3409
Vasanthi BhaskaranDiscovery Toxicology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA.
Myrtle DavisDiscovery Toxicology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA.
Rhiannon N HardwickDiscovery Toxicology, Bristol Myers Squibb, San Diego, California 92130, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9052-1309
Stephen S FergusonDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3172-8347
Jason P StankoDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Piyush BajajGlobal Investigative Toxicology, Preclinical Safety, Sanofi, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
Karissa AdkinsGlobal Investigative Toxicology, Preclinical Safety, Sanofi, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
Nisha S SipesCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA.
E Sidney HunterCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA.
Maria T BaltazarUnilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Bedfordshire, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, UK.
Paul L CarmichaelUnilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Bedfordshire, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, UK.
Kritika SadhUnilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Bedfordshire, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, UK.
Richard A BeckerAmerican Chemistry Council, Washington, District of Columbia 20002, USA.

Funding

Safe and Sustainable Alternatives Research ProgramZIAES103381 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FERGUSON, STEPHEN · 2022 to 2025
$7.0M
TEX-VAL: Texas A&M Tissue Chip Validation CenterU24TR001950 · NCATS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI RUSYN, IVAN · 2016 to 2017
$4.2M
TEX-VAL: Texas A&M Tissue Chip Validation ConsortiumU24TR002633 · NCATS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI RUSYN, IVAN, STEPHAN, CLIFFORD C · 2018 to 2019
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR001950NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR002633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much has been written and said about the promise and excitement of microphysiological systems, miniature devices that aim to recreate aspects of human physiology on a chip. The rapid explosion of the offerings and persistent publicity placed high expectations on both product manufacturers and regulatory agencies to adopt the data. Inevitably, discussions of where this technology fits in chemical testing paradigms are ongoing. Some end-users became early adopters, whereas others have taken a more cautious approach because of the high cost and uncertainties of their utility. Here, we detail the experience of a public-private collaboration established for testing of diverse microphysiological systems. Collectively, we present a number of considerations on practical aspects of using microphysiological systems in the context of their applications in decision-making. Specifically, future end-users need to be prepared for extensive on-site optimization and have access to a wide range of imaging and other equipment. We reason that cells, related reagents, and the technical skills of the research staff, not the devices themselves, are the most critical determinants of success. Extrapolation from concentration-response effects in microphysiological systems to human blood or oral exposures, difficulties with replicating the whole organ, and long-term functionality remain as critical challenges. Overall, we conclude that it is unlikely that a rodent- or human-equivalent model is achievable through a finite number of microphysiological systems in the near future; therefore, building consensus and promoting the gradual incorporation of these models into tiered approaches for safety assessment and decision-making is the sensible path to wide adoption.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesHumansin vitro modelsnew approach methodstissue chips

Identifiers

PMID35689632
PMCPMC9333404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.