Trial reportJournal of cosmetic dermatology2022
A split-face, blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars.
Trial report in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Midface Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Synthetic Dermal Fillers in Treating Acne Scars: A Comparative Systematic Review.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- The Effect of Local Hyaluronic Acid Injection on Skin Aging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Adverse Events Associated with Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection for Non-surgical Facial Aesthetics: A Systematic Review of High Level of Evidence Studies.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- A split-face, blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Trial
- Injectable Fillers for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Evidence, and Clinical Algorithms.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Review
- Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Comprehensive Guide for Cosmetic Dermatologists.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Evidence-based management of cutaneous scarring in dermatology part 2: atrophic acne scarring.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo-controlled study.
objectiveTo analyze the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler for atrophic facial scars. METHODS & MATERIALS: Fifteen subjects were randomized to receive up to 1 ml of VYC-17.5 L on one cheek and up to 1 ml of saline on the other side, with an optional touch-up treatment. Subjects were graded by a live blind evaluator using the Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System (QGSGS) (J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006;5:48), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and Canfield photo-analysis.
resultsAccording to the blind evaluator, there was a significant reduction 90 days after the last treatment on the QGSGS for VYC-17.5L compared with saline (-6.6 VYC-17.5L vs -1.7 saline [t(28) = -4.3196, p = 0.008]). There was a smaller, but still significant reduction on the QGSGS for saline alone (10.4 to 8.6 [t(14) = -3.453, p = 0.004]). In addition, 93% (13/14) of subjects chose VYC-17.5L over saline treatment and reported an improvement on the GAIS. There were no serious side effects and all minor side effects resolved by Day 30.
conclusionVYC-17.5L achieved significant improvements in rolling atrophic scars as compared to saline, though saline also had modest improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.