Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35689468›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022

PD-L1 in gestational trophoblastic disease: an antibody evaluation.

Yvonne M Hoeijmakers, Michiel Simons, Johan Bulten, Mark A J Gorris, Petronella B Ottevanger, I Jolanda M de Vries, Fred C G J Sweep

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic oncology: Current status and perspectives.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. PD-L1 in gestational trophoblastic disease: an antibody evaluation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yvonne M HoeijmakersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3327-9218
Michiel SimonsDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johan BultenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mark A J GorrisDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Petronella B OttevangerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
I Jolanda M de VriesDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fred C G J SweepDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment with antibodies directed against programed-cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a novel therapy for patients with gestational trophoblastic disease. Assessment of PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue is commonly used to identify patients who might benefit from anti-PD-L1 treatment. Multiple antibodies are available to detect PD-L1-expressing cells, and percentages of PD-L1-expressing cells in samples of patients with gestational trophoblastic disease indicated by these antibodies differ substantially. This raises the question which PD-L1 antibody best reflects PD-L1 expression to select patients for treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsSeven commercially available antibodies for PD-L1 staining (E1L3N, 73-10, 22C3, CAL10, SP142, 28-8, SP263) were validated on Chinese hamster ovarian (CHO) cells transfected with PD-L1, PD-L2, wildtype CHO cells and tonsil tissue. Next, four complete hydatidiform moles and four choriocarcinomas were stained. Samples were independently assessed by two pathologists.

resultsAll seven antibodies showed membranous staining in the PD-L1-transfected CHO cells. E1L3N and 22C3 scored the highest percentages of PD-L1-positive cells (70%-90% and 60%-70%, respectively). E1L3N stained the cytoplasm of non-transfected CHO cells and was excluded from analysis. The remaining six antibodies predominantly stained syncytiotrophoblast cells of both complete hydatidiform moles and choriocarcinomas. The percentage of PD-L1-stained trophoblast cells and staining intensity varied substantially per used PD-L1 antibody and between complete hydatidiform moles and choriocarcinomas. Agreement between pathologists was best with 22C3 (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.94-0.96).

conclusionsBased on staining results of the CHO cells, gestational trophoblastic disease samples and intraclass correlation coefficient, 22C3 seems the most suitable for adequate detection of PD-L1-expressing trophoblast cells. All antibodies detected PD-L1-expressing cells in the gestational trophoblastic disease samples, though with great variability, hampering comparison of results between studies in this rare disease and emphasizing the need for uniformity in detecting PD-L1-expressing cells.

Indexed as

ChoriocarcinomaGestational Trophoblastic DiseaseHydatidiform MoleAnimalsAntibodiesB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCricetinaeCricetulusFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryPregnancyAntibodiesB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, Tumorchoriocarcinomacomplete hydatidiform molegestational trophoblastic diseasegestational trophoblastic neoplasiaPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID35689468
PMCPMC9564454
OpenAlexW4282938720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.