Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35689465›Full record

ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2022

Morphometric changes on the vulva from proestrus to oestrus of nulliparous and multiparous HYPERPROLIFIC sows.

Paloma De la Cruz-Vigo, Alvaro Rodriguez-Boñal, Angel Rodriguez-Bonilla, Alejandro Córdova-Izquierdo, Sonia S Pérez Garnelo, Ernesto Gómez-Fidalgo, Mercedes Martín-Lluch, Raúl Sánchez-Sánchez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sow Estrus Detection Based on the Fusion of Vulvar Visual Features.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paloma De la Cruz-VigoDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5143-6029
Alvaro Rodriguez-BoñalLivestock Feed COSAD, Toledo, Spain.
Angel Rodriguez-BonillaLivestock Feed COSAD, Toledo, Spain.
Alejandro Córdova-IzquierdoAutonomous Metropolitan University Xochimilco Unit, México City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-6310
Sonia S Pérez GarneloDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7600-0539
Ernesto Gómez-FidalgoDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9128-5272
Mercedes Martín-LluchDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-4196
Raúl Sánchez-SánchezDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2987-5906
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MX

Funding

Centre for Industrial Technological Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess whether vulvar morphometric changes occurring in female pigs during proestrus and oestrus could be objective, accurate and predictive indicators of the onset to oestrus and thus performed artificial inseminations at the most appropriate time. For that purpose, pictures of vulvas from 60 hyperprolific females (30 gilts and 30 sows) during proestrus and oestrus were taken once a day. Vulva measurements (area, perimeter, length and width) on these pictures were performed using the image processing ImageJ software. Gilts and sows showed statistical differences (p < .01) in all vulvar morphometric measurements between proestrus and oestrus. Statistical differences in vulvar metrics were detected 24 h before the onset to oestrus, affecting all vulvar measurements in gilts, whereas only vulvar width was affected in sows. The image analysis used in this study may contribute to the development of smart technology in swine farming.

Indexed as

EstrusInsemination, ArtificialAnimalsFemaleProestrusSus scrofaSwineVulvagiltoestrussowvulva size

Identifiers

PMID35689465
PMCPMC9796286
OpenAlexW4282593697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.