Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35689427›Full record

ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2023

Craniofacial microsomia - more than a structural malformation.

Louhi Kuu-Karkku, Auli Suominen, Anna-Liisa Svedström-Oristo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Establishing an International Interdisciplinary Research Network in Craniofacial Microsomia: The CARE Program.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Functional and Genetic Analyses Unveil the Implication ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Craniofacial microsomia - more than a structural malformation.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louhi Kuu-KarkkuPediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Auli SuominenDepartment of Community Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Anna-Liisa Svedström-OristoPediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-7854
University of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyse the prevalence and distribution of craniofacial microsomia (CFM) cases in Finland and their most frequent comorbidities. The second aim was to analyse the patients' need for specialized healthcare services. MATERIALS AND

methodsData were gathered from two complementary registers: The Register of Congenital Malformations and the Care Register for Social Welfare and Health Care (Hilmo) of the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).

resultsThe prevalence of CFM patients in Finland was 1:10 057. They were evenly distributed across the five university hospital districts. Their most frequently used ICD-10 diagnosis codes were F40-48 (Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders), 60% of patients in adolescent and adult psychiatry; Q67.0 (Facial asymmetry), 43% in plastic surgery; Z00.4 (General psychiatric examination, not elsewhere classified), 31% in child psychiatry; Z31.5 (Genetic counselling), 28% in clinical genetics and Q67.40 (Other congenital deformities of the skull, face and jaw, Hemifacial atrophy), 18% in dental, oral and maxillofacial diseases. Of the patients, 70% had had visits in clinical genetics, 60% in plastic surgery, 41% in dental, oral and maxillofacial diseases, 28% in adolescent/adult psychiatry and 21% in child psychiatry. The majority of the patients' plastic surgery visits were concentrated in one university hospital. Other services were mainly provided by patients' own hospital districts.

conclusionsEven though the majority of CFM patients' visits in specialized healthcare services are related to correction of facial asymmetry and ear malformations, the obvious need for psychiatric care was apparent in all age groups.

Indexed as

Goldenhar SyndromeAdolescentAdultChildDelivery of Health CareFacial AsymmetryHumansPrevalenceSkullcongenital deformitycraniofacial microsomiahospital districtsspecialized healthcare servicesstructural malformation

Identifiers

PMID35689427
PMCPMC10084096
OpenAlexW4282594138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.