Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35689300›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2022

The role of prenatal exposure to antidepressants, anxiolytic, and hypnotics and its underlying illness on the risk of miscarriage using BIFAP database.

Álvaro Kitchin, Consuelo Huerta, Ana Llorente-García, David Martínez, Paloma Ortega, Lucía Cea-Soriano

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. First trimester antidepressant use and miscarriage: a population-based cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Álvaro KitchinDepartment of Public Health and Maternal Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid.
Consuelo HuertaDepartment of Public Health and Maternal Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid.
Ana Llorente-GarcíaBIFAP, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain.
David MartínezDepartment of Public Health and Maternal Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid.
Paloma OrtegaDepartment of Public Health and Maternal Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid.
Lucía Cea-SorianoDepartment of Public Health and Maternal Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESAgencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the notable increase on the prescription of antidepressants and anxiolytics during pregnancy, recommendation on maintaining the treatment during prenatal period is still controversial. We aimed to separately assess the role of effects of the antidepressants and anxiolytic and the underlying illness, controlled by potential confounding associated with miscarriage onset.

methodsWe used data from a validated pregnant cohort aged 15-49 years from 2002 to 2016 using BIFAP database. All confirmed miscarriages were used to perform a nested control analysis using conditional logistic regression. Women were classified according to use of each drug of interest into four mutually exclusive groups: nonusers, users only during prepregnancy, continuers, and initiators during first trimester. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for major confounders during pregnancy such as number of visits to primary care practitioners visits, obesity, smoking, HTA, diabetes with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

resultsCompared with nonusers, antidepressants continuers had the highest increased risk of miscarriage aOR (95%) of 1.29 (1.13-1.46), being continuers of paroxetine and fluoxetine the antidepressants with the strongest association. Likewise, continuers of anxiolytics and initiators showed an increased risk of 1.19 (1.04-1.37) and 1.30 (1.13-1.50). When separating the effect between the condition itself or the treatment, women exposed during first trimester, regardless treatment duration and/or the underlying illness, had the highest risk 1.27 (1.08-1.51) for antidepressants and 1.25 (1.13-1.39) for anxiolytics.

conclusionsOur analysis showed an association between prenatal exposure to antidepressants and anxiolytics and miscarriage onset after controlling by potential confounding adjusting for confounders and the underlying illness. This association was not supported for hypnotic medications. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the risk of miscarriage among subpopulation of pregnant women requiring these medications.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAnti-Anxiety AgentsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAntidepressive AgentsFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesPregnancyAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntidepressive AgentsHypnotics and Sedativesantidepressantsanxiolyticscase control studyexposuremiscarriage

Identifiers

PMID35689300
PMCPMC9543237
OpenAlexW4282927205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.