Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35689182›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Global, highly specific and fast filtering of alignment seeds.

Matthis Ebel, Giovanna Migliorelli, Mario Stanke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthis EbelInstitute for Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 47, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Giovanna MigliorelliInstitute for Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 47, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Mario StankeInstitute for Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str. 47, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. mario.stanke@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8696-0384
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 407540_167331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important initial phase of arguably most homology search and alignment methods such as required for genome alignments is seed finding. The seed finding step is crucial to curb the runtime as potential alignments are restricted to and anchored at the sequence position pairs that constitute the seed. To identify seeds, it is good practice to use sets of spaced seed patterns, a method that locally compares two sequences and requires exact matches at certain positions only.

resultsWe introduce a new method for filtering alignment seeds that we call geometric hashing. Geometric hashing achieves a high specificity by combining non-local information from different seeds using a simple hash function that only requires a constant and small amount of additional time per spaced seed. Geometric hashing was tested on the task of finding homologous positions in the coding regions of human and mouse genome sequences. Thereby, the number of false positives was decreased about million-fold over sets of spaced seeds while maintaining a very high sensitivity.

conclusionsAn additional geometric hashing filtering phase could improve the run-time, accuracy or both of programs for various homology-search-and-align tasks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomeAnimalsMiceSequence AlignmentAlignmentAlignment anchorGenome alignmentGeometric hashingSpaced seeds

Identifiers

PMID35689182
PMCPMC9188137
OpenAlexW4281672135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.