Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35689180›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

A community edutainment intervention for gender-based violence, sexual and reproductive health, and maternal and child health in rural Senegal: a process evaluation.

Agnes Le Port, Moustapha Seye, Jessica Heckert, Amber Peterman, Annick Nganya Tchamwa, Malick Dione, Abdou Salam Fall, Melissa Hidrobo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Agnes Le PortMontpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (MoISA), University of Montpellier, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France. agnes.leport@ird.fr.
Moustapha SeyeLaboratoire des Transformations Économiques et Sociales - Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire- Ch.A. Diop, University of Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Jessica HeckertInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
Amber PetermanUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Annick Nganya TchamwaLaboratoire des Transformations Économiques et Sociales - Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire- Ch.A. Diop, University of Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Malick DioneInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Dakar, Senegal.
Abdou Salam FallLaboratoire des Transformations Économiques et Sociales - Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire- Ch.A. Diop, University of Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Melissa HidroboInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Dakar, Senegal.
Fondation FondaMental · FRInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEdutainment aims to spread educational messages in an entertaining way, and often reaches large audiences. While studies increasingly report the impacts of edutainment interventions, there is limited context-specific evidence on the underlying processes and barriers to effective delivery, especially in rural areas. This article presents results from a process evaluation of a community-based edutainment intervention designed to improve knowledge, attitudes, and practices on gender-based violence (GBV), sexual and reproductive health (SRH), and maternal and child health. The intervention focused on the television series, C'est la Vie!, screened through biweekly film clubs in rural Senegal and included post-screening discussions and thematic workshops, meant to reinforce messages, increase knowledge, and change social norms. The objectives of this study were to assess intervention adaptation, implementation fidelity, participants' responsiveness or engagement, and series appropriateness.

methodsThe intervention was implemented from December 2019 to March 2020 in 120 villages in Kaolack and Kolda regions of Senegal, and targeted adolescent girls and young women aged 14 to 34. The process evaluation was carried out in March 2020 in 14 villages using: i) individual semi-structured interviews with implementers (n = 3), village chiefs (n = 8), married women (n = 9), adolescent girls (n = 8), and men (n = 8); ii) focus groups with men (n = 7, 29 participants) and women (n = 10, 100 participants); and iii) observations of screening sessions (n = 4) and post-screening discussions (n = 2). Data were analyzed using thematic and content analysis.

resultsThe results highlight that adaptation of the intervention helped reach the target population and improved participant attendance, but might have compromised fidelity to original design, as intervention components were shortened and modified for rural delivery and some facilitators made ad hoc modifications. The screenings coverage and frequency were adequate; however, their duration was shortened due to COVID-19 restrictions in Senegal. Participant responsiveness was excellent, as was the series appropriateness for most topics, including GBV. SRH remains a sensitive topic for youth, especially when the film clubs included non-peers, such as slightly older women.

conclusionsThis study showed that using film clubs to deliver sensitive edutainment content in rural areas is feasible and has potential for scale-up.

Indexed as

COVID-19Gender-Based ViolenceAdolescentAgedChildChild HealthFemaleHumansMaleReproductive HealthSenegalEdutainmentGender-based violenceMaternal and child healthProcess evaluationSenegalSexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID35689180
PMCPMC9185706
OpenAlexW4281649292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.