Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35688914›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Using deep learning to detect digitally encoded DNA trigger for Trojan malware in Bio-Cyber attacks.

M S Islam, S Ivanov, H Awan, J Drohan, S Balasubramaniam, L Coffey, S Kidambi, W Sri-Saan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. AI security and cyber risk in IoT systems.Frontiers in big data · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M S IslamVistaMilk Research Centre, Walton Institute, South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland. sibleeislam@gmail.com.
S IvanovVistaMilk Research Centre, Walton Institute, South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland.
H AwanMunster Technological University, Cork, Ireland.
J DrohanPharmaceutical and Molecular Biotechnology Research Centre, South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland.
S BalasubramaniamSchool of Computing, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
L CoffeyPharmaceutical and Molecular Biotechnology Research Centre, South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland.
S KidambiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
W Sri-SaanSchool of Computing, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USSouth East Technological UniversityWaterford Institute of Technology · IEMunster Technological University · IE

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland [16/RC/3835] - VistaMilk
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article uses Deep Learning technologies to safeguard DNA sequencing against Bio-Cyber attacks. We consider a hybrid attack scenario where the payload is encoded into a DNA sequence to activate a Trojan malware implanted in a software tool used in the sequencing pipeline in order to allow the perpetrators to gain control over the resources used in that pipeline during sequence analysis. The scenario considered in the paper is based on perpetrators submitting synthetically engineered DNA samples that contain digitally encoded IP address and port number of the perpetrator's machine in the DNA. Genetic analysis of the sample's DNA will decode the address that is used by the software Trojan malware to activate and trigger a remote connection. This approach can open up to multiple perpetrators to create connections to hijack the DNA sequencing pipeline. As a way of hiding the data, the perpetrators can avoid detection by encoding the address to maximise similarity with genuine DNAs, which we showed previously. However, in this paper we show how Deep Learning can be used to successfully detect and identify the trigger encoded data, in order to protect a DNA sequencing pipeline from Trojan attacks. The result shows nearly up to 100% accuracy in detection in such a novel Trojan attack scenario even after applying fragmentation encryption and steganography on the encoded trigger data. In addition, feasibility of designing and synthesizing encoded DNA for such Trojan payloads is validated by a wet lab experiment.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityDeep LearningDNASequence Analysis, DNASoftwareDNA

Identifiers

PMID35688914
PMCPMC9186480
OpenAlexW4281642108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.