Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35688855›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evoked responses to note onsets and phrase boundaries in Mozart's K448.

Yijing Feng, Robert J Quon, Barbara C Jobst, Michael A Casey

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06425029 (SONATA), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06425029 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

SONATA: Self-administered ONe-of-a Kind Approach to Epilepsy Therapy Through a Web-based Music Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled24ConditionsEpilepsy, Refractory Epilepsy, MusicArmsExperimental Intervention (Music A), Active Comparator Intervention (Music B), Active Comparator Intervention (Music C)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yijing Feng *Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Robert J Quon *Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Barbara C Jobst *Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Michael A Casey *Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. michael.a.casey@dartmouth.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the neural correlates of perception of hierarchical structure in music presents a direct window into auditory organization. To examine the hypothesis that high-level and low-level structures-i.e. phrases and notes-elicit different neural responses, we collected intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) data from eight subjects during exposure to Mozart's K448 and directly compared Event-related potentials (ERPs) due to note onsets and those elicited by phrase boundaries. Cluster-level permutation tests revealed that note-onset-related ERPs and phrase-boundary-related ERPs were significantly different at [Formula: see text], 200, and 450 ms relative to note onset and phrase markers. We also observed increased activity in frontal brain regions when processing phrase boundaries. We relate these observations to (1) a process which syntactically binds notes together hierarchically to form larger phrases; (2) positive emotions induced by successful prediction of forthcoming phrase boundaries and violations of melodic expectations at phrase boundaries.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyMusicAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionBrainBrain MappingEvoked PotentialsEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHumans

Identifiers

PMID35688855
PMCPMC9187696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.