Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35688753›Full record

ArticleIntensive & critical care nursing2022

Critical care nurses' perception of moral distress in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic - A pilot study.

Maria Andersson, Anna Nordin, Åsa Engström

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive & critical care nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria AnderssonSwedish Red Cross University College, SE-141 21 Huddinge, Sweden; Lulea University of Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, SE-97187 Luleå, Sweden. Electronic address: maria.andersson@rkh.se.
Anna NordinLulea University of Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, SE-97187 Luleå, Sweden; Karlstad University, Department of Health Science, Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology, Sweden.
Åsa EngströmLulea University of Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, SE-97187 Luleå, Sweden.
Karlstad University · SELuleå University of Technology · SERed Cross University College of Nursing · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe critical care nurses' perception of moral distress during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN/

methodsA cross-sectional study involving a questionnaire was conducted. Participants responded to the Italian version of the Moral Distress Scale-Revised, which consists of 14 items divided in dimensions Futile care (three items), Ethical misconduct (five items), Deceptive communication (three items) and Poor teamwork (three items). For each item, participants were also invited to write about their experiences and participants' intention to leave a position now was measured by a dichotomous question. The data were analysed with descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. The study followed the checklist (CHERRIES) for reporting results of internet surveys.

settingCritical care nurses (n = 71) working in Swedish adult intensive care units.

resultsCritical care nurses experienced the intensity of moral distress as the highest when no one decided to withdraw ventilator support to a hopelessly ill person (Futile care), and when they had to assist another physician or nurse who provided incompetent care (Poor teamwork). Thirty-nine percent of critical care nurses were considering leaving their current position because of moral distress.

conclusionsDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, critical care nurses, due to their education and experience of intensive care nursing, assume tremendous responsibility for critically ill patients. Throughout, communication within the intensive care team seems to have a bearing on the degree of moral distress. Improvements in communication and teamwork are needed to reduce moral distress among critical care nurses.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMoralsPandemicsPerceptionPilot ProjectsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19EthicsIntensive CareMoral distressNursing

Identifiers

PMID35688753
PMCPMC9167948
OpenAlexW4281644569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.