Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35688672›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2023

Efficient full Monte Carlo modelling and multi-energy generative model development of an advanced X-ray device.

Hermann Fuchs, Lukas Zimmermann, Niklas Reisz, Markus Zeilinger, Alexander Ableitinger, Dietmar Georg, Peter Kuess

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hermann FuchsMedical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Wien, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Marie-Curie-Straße 5, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria. Electronic address: hermann.fuchs@meduniwien.ac.at.
Lukas ZimmermannMedical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Wien, Austria; Faculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Straße 3, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Competence Center for Preclinical Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Straße 3, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Niklas ReiszMedical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Wien, Austria; Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädter Strasse 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria.
Markus ZeilingerFaculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Straße 3, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Competence Center for Preclinical Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Straße 3, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Alexander AbleitingerMedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Marie-Curie-Straße 5, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Dietmar GeorgMedical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Wien, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Marie-Curie-Straße 5, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Peter KuessMedical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Wien, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Marie-Curie-Straße 5, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
MedAustron · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATFachhochschule Wiener Neustadt · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of X-ray image devices require splitting the simulation into two parts (i.e. the generation of x-rays and the actual imaging). The X-ray production remains unchanged for repeated imaging and can thus be stored in phase space (PhS) files and used for subsequent MC simulations. Especially for medical images these dedicated PhS files require a large amount of data storage, which is partly why Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) were recently introduced. We enhanced the approach by a conditional GAN to model multiple energies using one network. This study compares the use of PhSs, GANs, and conditional GANs as photon source with measurements. An X-ray -based imaging system (i.e. ImagingRing) was modelled in this study. half-value layers (HVLs), focal spot, and Heel effect were measured for subsequent comparison. MC simulations were performed with GATE-RTion v1.0 considering the geometry and materials of the imaging system with vendor specific schematics. A traditional GAN model as well as the favourable conditional GAN was implemented for PhS generation. Results of the MC simulation were in agreement with the measurements regarding HVL, focal spot, and Heel effect. The conditional GAN performed best with a non-saturated loss function with R1 regularisation and gave similarly results as the traditional GAN approach. GANs proved to be superior to the PhS approach in terms of data storage and calculation overhead. Moreover, a conditional GAN enabled an energy interpolation to separate the network training process from the final required X-ray energies.

Indexed as

PhotonsComputer SimulationMonte Carlo MethodRadiographyX-RaysMachine learningMonte CarloNeuronal networksX-ray

Identifiers

PMID35688672
PMCPMC10311273
OpenAlexW4281631020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.