Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35688609›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2022

FELASA-AALAS Recommendations for Biosecurity in an Aquatic Facility, Including Prevention of Zoonosis, Introduction of New Fish Colonies, and Quarantine.

Jean-Philippe Mocho, Chereen Collymore, Susan C Farmer, Emmanuel Leguay, Katrina N Murray, Nuno Pereira

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-Philippe MochoDanioVet, Joint Production System Ltd, Potters Bar, UK;, Email: jpmocho@daniovet.com.
Chereen CollymoreVeterinary Care and Services, Charles River Laboratories, Senneville, Quebec, Canada.
Susan C FarmerZebrafish Research Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Emmanuel LeguayVetoFish, Chateauneuf Les Martigues, France.
Katrina N MurrayZebrafish International Resource Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Nuno PereiraChronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), Nova Medical School, Lisbon; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lusophone University of Humanities and Technologies, Lisbon, Portugal; Gulbenkian Institute of Science, Oeiras, Portugal; ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal; Lisbon Oceanarium, Lisbon, Portugal.
Universidade Lusófona · PTUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC)P40OD011021 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Zoltan Marton Varga · 2012 to 2026
$36.0M
NIH HHS P40 OD011021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FELASA and AALAS established a joint working group to advise on good practices for the exchange of fish for research. In a first manuscript, the working group made recommendations for health monitoring and reporting of monitoring results. The focus of this second related manuscript is biosecurity in fish facilities. First, we define the risk of contamination of personnel by zoonotic pathogens from fish or from system water, including human mycobacteriosis. Preventive measures are recommended, such as wearing task-specific personal protective equipment. Then we discuss biosecurity, highlighting the establishment of biosecurity barriers to preserve the health status of a facility. A functional biosecurity program relies on integration of the entire animal facility organization, including the flow of staff and animals, water treatments, and equipment sanitation. Finally, we propose 4 steps for introducing new fish colonies: consideration of international trade and national restrictions; assessing risk according to fish source and developmental stage; establishing quarantine barriers; and the triage, screening, and treatment of newly imported fish. We then provide 3 realistic sample scenarios to illustrate practical biosecurity risk assessments and mitigation measures based on considerations of health status and quarantine conditions.

Indexed as

CommerceQuarantineAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBiosecurityInternationalityZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID35688609
PMCPMC9334003
OpenAlexW4282937566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.