Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35688556›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

A signature for pan-cancer prognosis based on neutrophil extracellular traps.

Yi Zhang, Liping Guo, Qichen Dai, Bingqing Shang, Ting Xiao, Xuebing Di, Kaitai Zhang, Lin Feng, Jianzhong Shou, Yipeng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Liping Guo *Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.
Qichen Dai *Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Bingqing ShangDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ting XiaoState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xuebing DiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Kaitai ZhangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lin FengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China fenglin@cicams.ac.cn shoujz@126.com yidoctor99@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0951-713X
Jianzhong ShouDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China fenglin@cicams.ac.cn shoujz@126.com yidoctor99@126.com.
Yipeng WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center| National Clinical Research Center for Cancer| Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China fenglin@cicams.ac.cn shoujz@126.com yidoctor99@126.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) were originally thought to be formed by neutrophils to trap invading microorganisms as a defense mechanism. Increasing studies have shown that NETs play a pivotal role in tumor progression and diffusion. In this case, transcriptome analysis provides an opportunity to unearth the association between NETs and clinical outcomes of patients with pan-cancer.

methodsThe transcriptome sequencing data of The Cancer Genome Atlas pan-cancer primary focus was obtained from UCSC Xena, and a 19-gene NETs score was then constructed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox regression model based on the expression levels of 69 NETs initial biomarkers we collected from multistudies. In addition, multiple datasets covering multiple cancer types from other databases were collected and used to validate the signature. Gene ontology enrichment analyses were used to annotate the functions of NETs-related pathways. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was implemented to evaluate the role of NETs-related genes in clinical patients across types of tumors, including lung adenocarcinoma (n=58), colorectal carcinoma (n=93), kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (n=90), and triple-negative breast cancer (n=80).

resultsThe NETs score was calculated based on 19-NETs related genes according to the LASSO Cox model. The NETs score was considered a hazardous factor in most cancer types, with a higher score indicating a more adverse outcome. In addition, we found that NETs were significantly correlated to various malignant biological processes, such as the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (R=0.7444, p<0.0001), angiogenesis (R=0.5369, p<0.0001), and tumor cell proliferation (R=0.3835, p<0.0001). Furthermore, in IHC cohorts of a variety of tumors, myeloperoxidase, a gene involved in the model and a classical delegate of NETs formation, was associated with poor clinical outcomes.

conclusionsCollectively, these constitutive and complementary biomarkers represented the ability of NETs formation to predict the development of patients' progression. Integrative transcriptome analyses plus clinical sample validation may facilitate the biomarker discovery and clinical transformation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellExtracellular TrapsKidney NeoplasmsBiomarkersEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansPrognosisBiomarkersNETs-related signaturepan-cancerprognosistranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID35688556
PMCPMC9189842
OpenAlexW4281616256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.