Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35688555›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Impact of radiotherapy and sequencing of systemic therapy on survival outcomes in melanoma patients with previously untreated brain metastasis: a multicenter DeCOG study on 450 patients from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG.

Cindy Franklin, Peter Mohr, Leonie Bluhm, Imke Grimmelmann, Ralf Gutzmer, Friedegund Meier, Marlene Garzarolli, Michael Weichenthal, Claudia Pfoehler, Rudolf Herbst and 28 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Melanoma with Brain Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Cindy FranklinDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany cindy.franklin@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9142-5423
Peter MohrDepartment of Dermatology, Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany.
Leonie BluhmDepartment of Dermatology, Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany.
Imke GrimmelmannDepartment of Dermatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ralf GutzmerDepartment of Dermatology, Muehlenkreiskliniken Minden and Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany.
Friedegund MeierSkin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Marlene GarzarolliSkin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Michael WeichenthalDepartment of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9060-4961
Claudia PfoehlerDepartment of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Rudolf HerbstDepartment of Dermatology, HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Patrick TerheydenDepartment of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-1677
Jochen UtikalSkin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jens UlrichDepartment of Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center, Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Dirk DebusDepartment of Dermatology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Sebastian HaferkampDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin KaatzDepartment of Dermatology, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany.
Andrea ForschnerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6185-4945
Ulrike LeiterDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Dorothee NashanDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Alexander KreuterDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, HELIOS St. Elisabeth Klinik Oberhausen, University Witten-Herdecke, Herdecke, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2275-499X
Michael SachseDepartment of Dermatology, Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Julia WelzelDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Lucie HeinzerlingDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, München, Germany.
Frank MeissDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Carsten WeishauptDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Thilo GambichlerDepartment of Dermatology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7862-3695
Gerhard WeyandtDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Hospital Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Edgar DippelDepartment of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Kerstin SchattonDepartment of Dermatology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Eren CelikDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maike TrommerDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-4273
Iris HelfrichDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Alexander RoeschDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Lisa ZimmerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Elisabeth LivingstoneDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Susanne HornDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Selma UgurelDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-6704
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEElbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEBayreuth Medical Center · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHelios Klinikum Erfurt · DEHELIOS St. Elisabeth Klinik Oberhausen · DEJohannes Wesling Klinikum Minden · DEKlinikum Bremerhaven-Reinkenheide · DEKlinikum Dortmund · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENuremberg Hospital · DERuhr University Bochum · DESaarland University · DESRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite of various therapeutic strategies, treatment of patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) still is a major challenge. This study aimed at investigating the impact of type and sequence of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapy (TT), radiotherapy, and surgery on the survival outcome of patients with MBM.

methodWe assessed data of 450 patients collected within the prospective multicenter real-world skin cancer registry ADOREG who were diagnosed with MBM before start of the first non-adjuvant systemic therapy. Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsOf 450 MBM patients, 175 (38.9%) received CTLA-4+PD-1 ICB, 161 (35.8%) PD-1 ICB, and 114 (25.3%) BRAF+MEK TT as first-line treatment. Additional to systemic therapy, 67.3% of the patients received radiotherapy (stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); conventional radiotherapy (CRT)) and 24.4% had surgery of MBM. 199 patients (42.2%) received a second-line systemic therapy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed the application of radiotherapy (HR for SRS: 0.213, 95% CI 0.094 to 0.485, p<0.001; HR for CRT: 0.424, 95% CI 0.210 to 0.855, p=0.016), maximal size of brain metastases (HR for MBM >1 cm: 1.977, 95% CI 1.117 to 3.500, p=0.019), age (HR for age >65 years: 1.802, 95% CI 1.016 to 3.197, p=0.044), and ECOG performance status (HR for ECOG ≥2: HR: 2.615, 95% CI 1.024 to 6.676, p=0.044) as independent prognostic factors of OS on first-line therapy. The type of first-line therapy (ICB vs TT) was not independently prognostic. As second-line therapy BRAF+MEK showed the best survival outcome compared with ICB and other therapies (HR for CTLA-4+PD-1 compared with BRAF+MEK: 13.964, 95% CI 3.6 to 54.4, p<0.001; for PD-1 vs BRAF+MEK: 4.587 95% CI 1.3 to 16.8, p=0.022 for OS). Regarding therapy sequencing, patients treated with ICB as first-line therapy and BRAF+MEK as second-line therapy showed an improved OS (HR for CTLA-4+PD-1 followed by BRAF+MEK: 0.370, 95% CI 0.157 to 0.934, p=0.035; HR for PD-1 followed by BRAF+MEK: 0.290, 95% CI 0.092 to 0.918, p=0.035) compared with patients starting with BRAF+MEK in first-line therapy. There was no significant survival difference when comparing first-line therapy with CTLA-4+PD-1 ICB with PD-1 ICB.

conclusionsIn patients with MBM, the addition of radiotherapy resulted in a favorable OS on systemic therapy. In BRAF-mutated MBM patients, ICB as first-line therapy and BRAF+MEK as second-line therapy were associated with a significantly prolonged OS.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAgedCTLA-4 AntigenHumansMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRegistriesCTLA-4 AntigenMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafImmunotherapyMelanomaRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35688555
PMCPMC9189852
OpenAlexW4282033014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.