Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35688121›Full record

ReviewUltrasonics sonochemistry2022

Ultrasound for microalgal cell disruption and product extraction: A review.

Ying Liu, Xin Liu, Yan Cui, Wenqiao Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Advances in Microbubble Technologies for Food Sanitization: A Comprehensive Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Therapeutic Prospects ofMarine drugs · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ying LiuState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Source Management and Technology, Shenzhen Academy of Environmental Science, Shenzhen 518001, Guangdong, China.
Xin LiuKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Ecosystem and Bioresource, Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai 536000, Guangxi, China.
Yan CuiGansu Innovation Center of Microalgae Technology, Hexi University, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China.
Wenqiao YuanDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. Electronic address: wyuan2@ncsu.edu.
Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Science · CNGuangxi Institute of Oceanography · CNHexi University · CNNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microalgae are a promising feedstock for the production of biofuels, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, due to their superior capability of converting solar energy and CO

Indexed as

MicroalgaeBiofuelsBiomassSolventsBiofuelsSolventsBioproductBiorefineryCell disruptionExtractionMicroalgaeUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35688121
PMCPMC9175141
OpenAlexW4281772961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.