ArticleESMO open2022
Who are the real high-risk patients with pathological T2N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer that can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy?
Article in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRLF1 Drives Prostate Cancer Progression via COMP-Mediated Activation of the FAK/PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway.Cancers · 2026Article
- A Review of the Current Approach and Treatment Landscape for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Adjuvant chemotherapy in pathological node-negative non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prognostic value of TLR from FDG PET/CT in patients with margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer.European radiology · 2023Article
- Diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of stage IB non-small cell lung cancer with visceral pleural invasion.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in pathological T2N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is not clear.
methodsOne thousand and fifty pathological T2N0M0 NSCLC patients were included and divided into two groups: with and without ACT. A propensity score matching analysis was carried out to minimize selection bias. The significance of ACT in high-risk patients was further analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess the impact of ACT on the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival.
resultsFor the entire cohort, 31.9% (335/1050) of patients received ACT. After propensity score matching, 325 pairs of patients were matched. OS and DFS were comparable between groups in the original or matched cohort, which was confirmed by the multivariate analysis (all P > 0.05). In high-risk patients, the data suggest that ACT could improve OS and DFS only in patients with tumours >4 cm (OS: P = 0.003; DFS: P = 0.013). ACT could significantly improve the 5-year OS in patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (P = 0.022). ACT, however, could not improve cancer-specific survival in any subgroup, including patients with tumours >4 cm or wild-type EGFR (all P > 0.05). For patients with other high-risk factors, ACT failed to benefit patients in long-term outcomes.
conclusionsIn resected pT2N0M0 NSCLC patients, those with tumours >4 cm and wild-type EGFR are real high-risk patients and could gain survival benefit from ACT. Further prospective study is needed to confirm the definition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.