ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022
Integrated COVID-19 Predictor: Differential expression analysis to reveal potential biomarkers and prediction of coronavirus using RNA-Seq profile data.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of artificial intelligence-based COVID-19 modeling on multimodal genetic information.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative review of artificial intelligence for transcriptomic biomarker discovery in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review: Molecular Diagnostics and Multi-Omics Approaches to Understanding Bovine Respiratory Disease.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- An optimized ensemble grey wolf-based pipeline for monkeypox diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unlocking the Potential of RNA Sequencing in COVID-19: Toward Accurate Diagnosis and Personalized Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrated analysis of RNA-seq datasets reveals novel targets and regulators of COVID-19 severity.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- IdentifyingBiomolecules · 2024Article
- Comparative transcriptome analysis of canola carrying a single vs stacked resistance genes against clubroot.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Computational identification of differentially-expressed genes as suggested novel COVID-19 biomarkers: A bioinformatics analysis of expression profiles.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- A Novel 3-Gene Signature for Identifying COVID-19 Patients Based on Bioinformatics and Machine Learning.Genes · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe world has been battling the continuous COVID-19 pandemic spread by the SARS-CoV-2 virus for last two years. The issue of viral disease prediction is constantly a matter of interest in virology and the study of disease transmission over the long years.
objectiveIn this study, we aimed to implement genome association studies using RNA-Seq of COVID-19 and reveal highly expressed gene biomarkers and prediction based on the machine learning model of COVID-19 analysis to combat this pandemic.
methodWe collected RNA-Seq gene count data for both healthy (Control) and non-healthy (Treated) COVID-19 cases. In this experiment, a sequence of bioinformatics strategies and statistical techniques, such as fold-change and adjusted p-value, were processed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We filtered biomarker sets of high DEGs, moderate DEGs, and low DEGs using DESeq2, Limma Trend, and Limma Voom methods based on intersection and union operations and applied machine learning techniques to predict COVID-19.
resultThrough experimental analysis, 67 potential biomarkers were extracted, comprising 49 up-regulated and 18 down-regulated genes, using statistical techniques and a set-theory consensus strategy. We trained the machine learning models on 12 different biomarker sets and found that the SVM model performed better than the other classifiers with 99.07% classification accuracy for moderate DEGs.
conclusionOur study revealed that identified differentially expressed genes of the moderate DEGs biomarker set, |log2FC| ≥ 2 with adjusted p-value < 0.05, work significantly as input features to implement a machine learning model using a kernel-based SVM technique to predict COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.